There's one interesting thing that I haven't considered about the reappearance of Osama in a recent video...

After a tape that appeared to show Osama discussing his "victory" was released in the closing weeks of 2001, the world was abuzz with conspiracy theories of how the US altered the tape. Why haven't those conspiracy theories been revisited in the news after the latest Osama media appearance? For those who doubted that Osama was responsible for Manhattan, the Pentagon, and Shanksville, what do you say now? Is this latest tape another fake?

Mandate schmandate... There are still fifty-six million people who didn't vote for you George. You will still have to work to earn the trust of those of us who didn't vote for you. Guess what? Those of us who didn't vote for you (and perhaps even some of those who did) will still exercise our free American voices if we feel that you're doing screwed up things.

Although I rant against the Prez frequently, I have nothing but respect for our troops. To that end... Happy 229th, USMC!

Well, I suppose....

John Kerry gave a pretty good fight and George W. Bush and friends are shrewd politicians. Congrats, Dubya. I just hope you'll be more of the uniter invoked in your victory speech today during this term. Hey, I guess not all is lost. As I've mentioned before, Kerry wouldn't have changed much anyway. More importantly, dubyaspeak.com will have four more years of fresh verbal fodder.

I think that a big thanks and good job should go to Michael Badnarik and the other alternative candidates who worked a long time doing the thankless job of getting their word out as much as possible without much assistance or coverage. Check out Michael's book! The Libertarian Presidential vote (percentage and tally) went up by more than double in our county this year.

Suzanne sent me an e-mail earlier this evening. It was a parody of the simple task of ordering a pizza under the Patriot Act. She just got it as a forward today. I figured that I'd try to find out how old it was. The link above is the earliest version that I've been able to find on the internets. I only bring it up because of the recent high profile political events. Renewal and refinement of Patriot is one of Bush's thrusts over the next four years.

I frequently gripe about Patriot here. People sometimes ask me, "If you haven't done anything, why are you worried about it?" Up until just now (really, just now), I haven't had a simple answer. To me the key lies in "haven't done anything". If I haven't done anything, I shouldn't have to worry about my library records being checked because I'm researching the history of jihad as an Islamic concept or DCS-1000 looking at what websites I visit. The worst part to me is that finding out if either of those things happened would approach impossibility unless the government released that type of info out of the goodness of their hearts. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. We'll see what happens...

Poll closing times (so you'll know when to get ready to weep or leap)?

Check out this site. Everything seems to be breaking as it's been predicted thus far....

This morning, NPR was talking about the electoral college possibilities...

Near the end of the segment (you can listen in Real or WMP format), they brought up a recent Washington Post study that found 33 possibilities for an electoral college tie. Hell, it might just be better to go ask the Magic Eight Ball if your choice will win. As a brief aside, they were actually talking about the Constitution Party at one point this morning. I knew that NPR had interviewed Michael Badnarik recently. It's nice to hear even a little bit of coverage given to the alternative candidates. Check out the platform of the Constitution Party. It's not completely for me, but I know people who would likely agree with almost every single plank.

In the past year or so, there's been all sorts of media coverage given to the WTC Memorial. I haven't heard much of anything about the Pentagon Memorial. Pictures and other info are available at that website.

I've had the chance to partake in a couple of online Zogby polls this year...

I took one a week or so ago. After the polls, they give a few links to a brief analysis of a couple of their recent products. The last one I took led me to an analysis of an August poll that Zogby did. One thing that struck me was that 90% of undecideds weren't satisfied with their choices this year. The time is so absolutely right for protest. A news report that I read today mentioned that 98% of the people asked have emphatically made up their mind. The vine was ripe for the picking in August. It will be very interesting to see if Nader, the Greens, the Libertarians, the Constitution Party, or any of the other alternative choices have any impact on tomorrow's results. I would say "May the best man win!", but I don't believe in either of the likely victors. Sorry!

Fiscal policies of Bush or Kerry...

There are some people who have significant government experience and have poor opinions of the fiscal policies of either of the two big-ticket candidates. What are the potential pitfalls of the way our "leaders" are spending? Read on...

I suppose that we're damned if we do and damned if we don't.

Two quick notes....

I was just doing some browsing and found two things.

If you thought about seeing Fahrenheit 9/11 but couldn't stomach paying the bucks that would eventually end up in Michael Moore's pocket, you can get it free. Click it (only until Nov. 2)!

Eminem's new video (Mosh) can be downloaded from here.

I don't keep up with "popular" music...

I gave up on MTV a long time ago (save for The Osbournes). I guess that my definition of cool is different now. Hey, that's fine because life is flux. Anyway, I caught a little bit of SNL last night. Eminem happened to be the musical guest. I had heard a small segment of his latest song encouraging people to get out and vote (presumably against the Shrub). It's called Mosh. For a long time, I didn't like Marshall Mathers very much. Thanks to Ric, I was actually exposed to some of Eminem's work. Yes, it's brash and vulgar at times. However, it comes from somewhere. We checked out 8 Mile not too long after that. Suzanne still has a low opinion of the music. The point of this whole thing is to say that I like Eminem's latest piece. Hell, it can't be too bad. Even Moby likes it. Check it out at mtv.com or Yahoo! Launch.

I'm not a sports fan by any stretch of the imagination, but "Go Packers"!

Election stuff...

I don't need to mention again that I'm voting for Michael Badnarik (oops, I guess I just did). It just occurred to me that I've failed to mention a local (Illinois at least) alternative. We have Obama and we have Keyes. On Tuesday, I'm voting to try to put Jerry Kohn in the US Senate. The other alternative candidate for the US Senate is Albert J. Franzen. I have some family members (immediate and extended) who think we should vote to keep the Shrub. Some even go as far as saying that our vote will be wasted and that this is no time for a protest vote. There are some "libertarians" voting for Bush this year on those grounds. I wholeheartedly disagree. My take on things is that a protest vote is needed now more than ever. But hey, opinions are like.....

Thoughts on failed strategery....

With the arrival of the latest bin Laden video, the spinmeisters from both sides of the aisle have predictably started... well, spinning away. Bush accuses Kerry of "Monday-morning quarterbacking" and Kerry accuses Shrubby of "outsourcing the job of getting Osama".

Now for my two cents...

Osama and company are killers. They are probably among some of the best in the world. Hell, a lot of them were called freedom fighters in the 80s and armed and funded (whether directly or indirectly) by the good old US of A. Responsibility for 9/11 lies solely at the feet of Al Qaeda and the nineteen men who took over the aircraft. However...

Bush and Kerry still don't appear to get the whole picture. Clinton should be put away for life for neglecting to even have a semblance of a plan for dealing with Osama on his home turf. We were right to go after Osama. We didn't do it the right way, but we can't change what's already been done. Bush wanted Osama "dead or alive" but failed to deploy anywhere near the number of troops necessary to achieve an overwhelming victory. I realize that Bush was left in kind of a crappy position after Slick Willy's time in office, but we could have done better. We were able to get over 100,000 troops into Iraq. Again, we can't change what's been done, but Bush isn't the right man for the job. Kerry is no better...

Neither Kerry nor Bush will even give the consideration necessary to the foreign policy changes that might be of assistance in the "war on terror".

Now, since the media likes to give short and sweet versions of things (and I detest link-rot), I've copied the transcript of Osama's entire speech from the English site of AlJazeera. Thank you AlJazeera!

"Transcript of bin Ladin's speech by Saturday 30 October 2004 11:28 AM GMT

Following is the English transcript of Usama bin Ladin's speech in a videotape aired by Aljazeera on Friday 29 October. In the interests of authenticity the transcript, which appeared as subtitles at the foot of the screen, has been left unedited.


To begin: Peace be upon he who follow the Guidance.

People of United States, this talk of mine is for you and concerns the ideal way to prevent another Manhattan and deals with the war and its causes and results.

Before I begin, I say to you that security is an indispensable pillar in human life and that free men do not forfeit their security contrary to Bush's claims that we hate freedom.

If so, then let him explain why did not strike - for example - Sweden.

And we know that freedom haters do not possess defiant spirits like those of the 19 may Allah have mercy on them.

No, we fight because we are free men who do not sleep under oppression.

We want to restore freedom to our Nation and just as you lay waste to our Nation so shall we lay waste to yours.

But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real cause and thus the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.

So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and I shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken for you to consider.

I say to you Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike towers.

But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the America/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.

The events that affected my soul in a difficult way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American 6th fleet helped them in that.

And the whole world saw and heard but did not respond.

In those difficult moments many hard to describe ideas bubbled in my soul but in the end they produced intense feelings of rejection of tyranny and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressors in kind and that we destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

We have not found it difficult to deal with the Bush administration in light of the resemblance it bears to the regimes in our countries, half of which are ruled by the military and the other half of which are ruled by the sons of kings and presidents.

Our experience with them is lengthy and both types are replete with those who are characterised by pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of wealth.

This resemblance began after the visits of Bush Senior to the region at a time when some of our compatriots were dazzled by America and hoping that these visits would have an effect on our countries. All of a sudden he was affected by these monarchies and military regimes and became jealous of their remaining decades in their position to embezzle the public wealth of the Nation without supervision or accounting.

So he took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to his son and they named it the Patriot Act under the pretences of fighting terrorism.

In addition, Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state governors and did not forget to import expertise in election fraud from the regions presidents to Florida to be made use of in moments of difficulty.

All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration.

And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within 20 minutes before Bush and his administration notice.

It never occurred to us that the Commander in Chief of the armed forces would abandon 50,000 of his citizens in the twin towers to face those great horrors alone at a time when they most needed him.

But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers we were given three times the period required to execute the operations. All praise is due to Allah.


Aljazeera
By

You can find this article at:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/79C6AF22-98FB-4A1C-B21F-2BC36E87F61F.htm"

Make of it what you will...

I'm continuing to consider the apparent blocking of georgewbush.com from foreign IPs...

The more I think about this, the more I get pissed off. The Libertarian in me realizes that, as private property (though for one of the biggest issues in the public's eye right now), the owner/admin of Dubya's re-election campaign site is free to do whatever he/she chooses with the site. However, the purpose of the site is to inform people about one of their choices for the President of the United States. Believe it or not, chuck@georgewbush.com, there could be Americans in other countries who want info about your candidate.

In the interest of maintaining some amount of freedom for public discourse and decision-making, click this link to access the georgewbush.com website from around the world. Hopefully that will work! If that link doesn't work, try one of the other free proxy servers listed here. Not all of the links listed there will work and since some are overseas, some of them will be blocked. However, give it your best shot. To borrow a line from Dubya...

"There ought to be limits to freedom."

-George W. Bush, 1999 (Hint: It's near the bottom)

NIPC's daily report site might not be updated anymore, but...

If you're interested in security related matters, DHS still creates a daily report of information culled from the public media about security matters. You can receive the daily report (Monday-Friday) by sending a subscription request e-mail to:

dhsdailyadmin -at- mail.dhs.osis.gov

It's just easier to have someone else gather the info. Hell, my tax money is helping create this info, so I might as well check it out. The reason I bring this up...

Today's report had a link to a press report about geocaching causing a bomb scare in Indiana. Paranoia KICKS ASS! I especially love the Blackford County Sheriff's statement about geocaching:

“People have to understand that I've been to three FBI and CIA briefings in the last two weeks, getting briefed on terrorists and terrorism. They need to find another game.”

Are you going to hold a scavenger hunt? You'd better contact the FBI, DHS, CIA, FEMA, RCMP, NSA, and any other organization that might be interested.

Those of you who might be traveling to foreign countries (or those who live there) might find this spot interesting. Ooooooooohhhhh, I just noticed this on the site. Warning: The OSAC website (the first link) can be painfully slow.

I've rethought part of my stance on Roy Moore...

You still can't tell me that he wasn't trying to espouse one narrow view of religion over all others, but...

Why do I now support the stance that Roy Moore took? Locally, someone put a very graphic poster showing an aborted fetus in his front yard. People were quite offended by this individual's sign. I am staunchly pro-life. My pro-life attitude isn't driven by any religious values. I'm still agnostic. I'm just bothered by the fact that many people still say that we don't know when life begins but we aren't willing to err on the side of caution. Before a convict is sent to death row, they have to have passed the test of innocent until proven guilty and often the jury must be unanimous. Why are we willing to grant so much latitude to adults and unwilling to save the lives of the innocent unborn? Anyway, I'm all for this dude being able to have his sign in his front yard. He is just reminding the world of what happens in the clinic. He's taking a stand against what he views as a gruesome violation of rights. Roy Moore was doing the same thing. I also happen to feel that the right thing happened to Roy Moore. His peers put the smack down on him.

If it wasn't for brave souls bucking the system, the civil rights movement might not have gotten off the ground. Roy Moore would have never allowed an acknowledgement of other divine sources of law and that's my biggest problem with him. However, he fought with principled strength for what he believed. Sometimes you just have to take a stand. Perhaps it's just my anarchist side speaking....

Hey, I may bitch a lot but the world WON'T end when the next Republicrat is elected next week...

Actually, who knows? It might!

A new report (.pdf file) bolsters my belief that humans are and will remain the weakest link in a connected world. In many cases, there are cheap and fairly easy solutions to prevent many of the problems discussed in this report. The word needs to get out. I liked the idea that someone at Gnomedex brought up about making Windows Update CDs as ubiquitous as those AOL CDs at electronics stores.

I'd like to see a Bush campaign commercial where Bush says the following at the end...

"I'm George Bush and I approve this message. If you don't approve, Dick Cheney sends along a hearty "Fuck you!""

At least that would be a funny campaign ad.

My candidate for Prez was on Fox News today. The inevitable Iraq question came up. I know what Badnarik believes and I believe roughly the same thing. Linda Vester asked him a question along the lines of destabilization in Iraq after our forces leave. I believe that Michael knows the answer but I think the answer that was given could have been much more inspired and have historic examples. When our forces are asked to leave in the future, we won't be able to guarantee Iraqi security. We can't even guarantee a level of security comparable to that which we enjoy in the United States although we currently have 100,000+ troops on the ground. Obviously, the British couldn't guarantee security when they withdrew from their Palestinian Mandate. As long as we have troops on the ground in Arab countries, they will be targets and potentially stir MORE hatred of the U.S. (and draw more recruits for jihadist organizations) by the population. Even George Bush and friends realize this. Compare the numbers of our military in Saudi Arabia between now and four years ago. We've made a fairly quiet (although I have heard it mentioned a few times) withdrawal of our troops from Saudi Arabia. However, most of the forces have just been moved from one country to another in the region. Maybe they don't get it completely...

One of the recent rhetorical campaign swings by John Kerry cracks me up...

Kerry's rhetorical stance talks about the Bush campaign relying upon fear as a basis for Dubya's re-election. What the hell do you call talk of a draft being reinstated, railing against the impending privatization of social security, and chicken little/sky is falling/flu vaccine shortage apocalypse is coming talk? Kerry says that he just views a better America. Kerry likes to talk about a vision of hope. Well, Dubya has hopes too. Dubya desires a certain amendment to the Constitution, "renewal of key portions of the "Patriot Act"" (and if you believe it, potential expansion of those "tools"), freedom marching around the world (freedom will have to stay on the march for a long time if Dubya and friends think we will be God's tool on Earth to secure freedom for repressed societies), and more. Both candidates are just different sides of the same coin. They are ideologically different and yet they support (or supported) many of the same things. I like this chart for comparison. T-9 days and counting...

Awwwwwww, poor "spam king". My Bulk box was full of crap again today. Why should I believe that a spammer will comply with the law when the information contained in some of the spam proves beyond a doubt (to me at least) that a spammer is using bogus information for my e-mail address in the first place? Note to spammers: You have never received an opt-in from me from AOL because I've never HAD AOL.

I was stoked at work while watching Fox News last night (for a short period of time)...

The Libertarian Party (and the Badnarik/Campagna campaign) has raised enough dough to start doing nationwide ads. I caught one on Fox News last night. I'm sure it won't sway the race much, but hopefully it might stir some of Fox's conservative viewers to think about Dubya's brand of conservatism. A lot of conservatives often wonder about the Libertarian stance on the "war on drugs" and support for things like gay marriage. They view that as liberal. I beg to differ. The Libertarian stance is ultra-conservative. If it doesn't violate someone else's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness, there's a lot of activity that's protected by the Constitution. I suppose the "pursuit of happiness" part of things has a lot of wiggle-room.

Locally, some members of the QC Badnarik in 2004 meetup group did some banner-waving action at a busy QC intersection this morning. I believe they are planning on doing it next weekend. I'm glad to hear it because there was not a chance in hell that I could make it this morning. Honk if you love liberty!

Suzanne might want to kick my butt for saying it, but it's a rousing song from that new satirical movie...

"America! Fuck Yeah!"

Yes, we went and saw the latest sacrilege from the guys who brought South Park into the world. This movie is extraordinarily vulgar (surprise), so if that's not your cup of tea, you're best served by skipping it. If you can look past the raunchy side of things, this movie approaches hilarity defined. I've gathered that a lot of people don't think this made as much fun of "right wing nut jobs" as it poked "liberal wieners" in the eye. I see it differently. The over-the-top absurdity of the "heroes" in this flick is the finger pointed at the neo-con types. Again, if you can look past the "naughty" parts of this movie (and there are plenty), you might get a laugh.

Now for raunchiness of a different sort...

I checked my Yahoo! mail right before I went to sleep this morning and the Bulk box was empty. When we got home a little after five, there were 23 new junk messages. See? What a crock of crap!

Surprise, surprise!

11 days! Don't forget to go vote!

What's new and exciting here?

To be bluntly honest, not a whole lot! Suzanne's working for a bit tomorrow and I'm prepping myself for the vamp shift. I actually like working the midnight hours because I frequently find myself (especially when I'm off for six days) staying up at night anyway. Perhaps I'm a vampire...nahh!

I'm hoping that Suzanne will find out that she'll be able to return to a Monday-Friday shift tomorrow. That way, we'll be able to go see Team America: World Police. Seeing it while I'm working nights will be too much of a pain in the arse.

There is some exciting stuff going on in Bamaland. Congratulations!

I like to know things in the context in which they happened...

One reason is that the politicians of the world seem to like to distort things a little. The earliest reference I can find to this year's flu vaccine issues is from late August. Chiron said there were issues but they expected to be able to make up for it by early October. I'm willing to bet that our government took that announcement at face value. This issue isn't quite as easy as certain candidates for President are trying to make it seem. Anything to raise the Nov. 2 tally...

The contamination (I'm sure that you well-read people out there already know this) in this batch of vaccine was Serratia marcescens. I find it interesting that our government used it for bio-weapons research and presumably caused a drastic increase in pneumonia and urinary tract infections in and around the San Fran Bay Area in the 1950s. More on that can be found here.

Our bank offers downloadable account transaction records in three different formats. One of them is Excel. I don't have Excel on my laptop (I do have Open Office). Every time I was attempting to download a spreadsheet, IE crashed. I figured Open Office might automatically take care of it. I forgot to tell Windows to use Open Office to open .xls files. Another way to go about things is to download one (or more) of the MS Office file viewers from here. I downloaded the viewer and changed all associations to use Open Office. It's not that the viewers don't work. I just want to be able to manipulate the data and the viewers only let you look.

Addition to earlier gack...

We can also support our military men and women while asking the idiot politicians here at home what the hell they are doing sending troops to a hotbed like Iraq without enough vital equipment. Take that to heart, Henry Hyde. Yes, I am on one side. I call it the American side. I don't know what these buffoons are thinking when they suggest that criticism of the war or policies that led to it are unpatriotic or that the criticism gives the enemy aid and comfort. I actually do know what they are thinking, but they are wrong. Henry Hyde... you and your ilk can kindly kiss my ass.

If this is true, I might be screwed...

Is it bad to drink nearly a gallon of coffee every day?

I haven't talked much about the unit in Iraq that refused to perform a mission. Sometimes, risk just comes with the territory. However, I find it appalling that three years into the "war on terror" and a year and a half into the Iraqi excursion, troops aren't supplied with the best equipment. When does it become obvious that something more drastic needs to be done because even the leaders on the ground (and the people in Congress) know that things could be made safer? Families (or the soldiers guarding privately contracted individuals who make significantly more than they do) shouldn't have to buy their own body armor. Granted, John Kerry could have voted for the 87 billion after he voted for it, but we can't afford to be half-ass supporting our troops when they are fighting for the freedom of other countries. I'm still of the opinion that it isn't the job of our soldiers be freeing other countries.

Some blame must be placed on Kerry and all the others who voted yes (and are now bitching about the war) and essentially gave away their Constitutionally mandated power to declare war.

Rather than believe that the sky is falling because of a flu vaccine shortage, get the facts. It is bullshit that our supply is low but it's not the end of the world and it's not necessarily the fault of either of the two biggest BSers in this campaign. This whole flu thing did lead to John Edwards asking a funny rhetorical question... "And he couldn’t even manage this latest flu vaccine crisis. How can we trust him to deal with anthrax?" Nice. You still don't have my vote John Edwards, but that was hilarious. The Kerry-Edwards ticket couldn't do much better.

Sellam Ismail was on The Screen Savers this evening. He's responsible for this and this. That inspired me to seek out vintage public access systems accessible via the net. First and foremost, I can't say how cool SDF is. There are others. I just found the Deathrow OpenVMS cluster. Interesting...

Damn, I just thought about something...

I won't have much to bitch about after this campaign season is over. PSYCH! That's poppycock. Old Ron Northcutt stated it better. He would've said, "Auwww hell, that's horsesheeit!" Either of the two likely victors of November 2nd should keep my bitch session in progress for at least four more years.

What do we have here (PDF document)? Yes, it's another victory for free speech and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. I have a feeling that the more controversial portions of the Patriot Act will be dying a slow death over the next couple of years. Of course, there will be people trying to convince us that everything about Patriot is benign.

Perusing through a few blogs this evening (actually found at one in particular), I found this political test. Yeah, it's a front for a dating site, but I figured what the hell! Care to hear how I was described? I did take it a second time because I didn't think to mention how it described me earlier. Oddly enough, it said that I was a Libertarian the first time. The second time....

"You are a

Social Liberal
(88% permissive)

and an...

Economic Conservative
(93% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Anarchist

You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness."

Hmmmmm.....