You still can't tell me that he wasn't trying to espouse one narrow view of religion over all others, but...
Why do I now support the stance that Roy Moore took? Locally, someone put a very graphic poster showing an aborted fetus in his front yard. People were quite offended by this individual's sign. I am staunchly pro-life. My pro-life attitude isn't driven by any religious values. I'm still agnostic. I'm just bothered by the fact that many people still say that we don't know when life begins but we aren't willing to err on the side of caution. Before a convict is sent to death row, they have to have passed the test of innocent until proven guilty and often the jury must be unanimous. Why are we willing to grant so much latitude to adults and unwilling to save the lives of the innocent unborn? Anyway, I'm all for this dude being able to have his sign in his front yard. He is just reminding the world of what happens in the clinic. He's taking a stand against what he views as a gruesome violation of rights. Roy Moore was doing the same thing. I also happen to feel that the right thing happened to Roy Moore. His peers put the smack down on him.
If it wasn't for brave souls bucking the system, the civil rights movement might not have gotten off the ground. Roy Moore would have never allowed an acknowledgement of other divine sources of law and that's my biggest problem with him. However, he fought with principled strength for what he believed. Sometimes you just have to take a stand. Perhaps it's just my anarchist side speaking....
Wednesday, October 27, 2004
Tuesday, October 26, 2004
Hey, I may bitch a lot but the world WON'T end when the next Republicrat is elected next week...
Actually, who knows? It might!
A new report (.pdf file) bolsters my belief that humans are and will remain the weakest link in a connected world. In many cases, there are cheap and fairly easy solutions to prevent many of the problems discussed in this report. The word needs to get out. I liked the idea that someone at Gnomedex brought up about making Windows Update CDs as ubiquitous as those AOL CDs at electronics stores.
I'd like to see a Bush campaign commercial where Bush says the following at the end...
"I'm George Bush and I approve this message. If you don't approve, Dick Cheney sends along a hearty "Fuck you!""
At least that would be a funny campaign ad.
My candidate for Prez was on Fox News today. The inevitable Iraq question came up. I know what Badnarik believes and I believe roughly the same thing. Linda Vester asked him a question along the lines of destabilization in Iraq after our forces leave. I believe that Michael knows the answer but I think the answer that was given could have been much more inspired and have historic examples. When our forces are asked to leave in the future, we won't be able to guarantee Iraqi security. We can't even guarantee a level of security comparable to that which we enjoy in the United States although we currently have 100,000+ troops on the ground. Obviously, the British couldn't guarantee security when they withdrew from their Palestinian Mandate. As long as we have troops on the ground in Arab countries, they will be targets and potentially stir MORE hatred of the U.S. (and draw more recruits for jihadist organizations) by the population. Even George Bush and friends realize this. Compare the numbers of our military in Saudi Arabia between now and four years ago. We've made a fairly quiet (although I have heard it mentioned a few times) withdrawal of our troops from Saudi Arabia. However, most of the forces have just been moved from one country to another in the region. Maybe they don't get it completely...
A new report (.pdf file) bolsters my belief that humans are and will remain the weakest link in a connected world. In many cases, there are cheap and fairly easy solutions to prevent many of the problems discussed in this report. The word needs to get out. I liked the idea that someone at Gnomedex brought up about making Windows Update CDs as ubiquitous as those AOL CDs at electronics stores.
I'd like to see a Bush campaign commercial where Bush says the following at the end...
"I'm George Bush and I approve this message. If you don't approve, Dick Cheney sends along a hearty "Fuck you!""
At least that would be a funny campaign ad.
My candidate for Prez was on Fox News today. The inevitable Iraq question came up. I know what Badnarik believes and I believe roughly the same thing. Linda Vester asked him a question along the lines of destabilization in Iraq after our forces leave. I believe that Michael knows the answer but I think the answer that was given could have been much more inspired and have historic examples. When our forces are asked to leave in the future, we won't be able to guarantee Iraqi security. We can't even guarantee a level of security comparable to that which we enjoy in the United States although we currently have 100,000+ troops on the ground. Obviously, the British couldn't guarantee security when they withdrew from their Palestinian Mandate. As long as we have troops on the ground in Arab countries, they will be targets and potentially stir MORE hatred of the U.S. (and draw more recruits for jihadist organizations) by the population. Even George Bush and friends realize this. Compare the numbers of our military in Saudi Arabia between now and four years ago. We've made a fairly quiet (although I have heard it mentioned a few times) withdrawal of our troops from Saudi Arabia. However, most of the forces have just been moved from one country to another in the region. Maybe they don't get it completely...
Sunday, October 24, 2004
One of the recent rhetorical campaign swings by John Kerry cracks me up...
Kerry's rhetorical stance talks about the Bush campaign relying upon fear as a basis for Dubya's re-election. What the hell do you call talk of a draft being reinstated, railing against the impending privatization of social security, and chicken little/sky is falling/flu vaccine shortage apocalypse is coming talk? Kerry says that he just views a better America. Kerry likes to talk about a vision of hope. Well, Dubya has hopes too. Dubya desires a certain amendment to the Constitution, "renewal of key portions of the "Patriot Act"" (and if you believe it, potential expansion of those "tools"), freedom marching around the world (freedom will have to stay on the march for a long time if Dubya and friends think we will be God's tool on Earth to secure freedom for repressed societies), and more. Both candidates are just different sides of the same coin. They are ideologically different and yet they support (or supported) many of the same things. I like this chart for comparison. T-9 days and counting...
Awwwwwww, poor "spam king". My Bulk box was full of crap again today. Why should I believe that a spammer will comply with the law when the information contained in some of the spam proves beyond a doubt (to me at least) that a spammer is using bogus information for my e-mail address in the first place? Note to spammers: You have never received an opt-in from me from AOL because I've never HAD AOL.
Awwwwwww, poor "spam king". My Bulk box was full of crap again today. Why should I believe that a spammer will comply with the law when the information contained in some of the spam proves beyond a doubt (to me at least) that a spammer is using bogus information for my e-mail address in the first place? Note to spammers: You have never received an opt-in from me from AOL because I've never HAD AOL.
Saturday, October 23, 2004
I was stoked at work while watching Fox News last night (for a short period of time)...
The Libertarian Party (and the Badnarik/Campagna campaign) has raised enough dough to start doing nationwide ads. I caught one on Fox News last night. I'm sure it won't sway the race much, but hopefully it might stir some of Fox's conservative viewers to think about Dubya's brand of conservatism. A lot of conservatives often wonder about the Libertarian stance on the "war on drugs" and support for things like gay marriage. They view that as liberal. I beg to differ. The Libertarian stance is ultra-conservative. If it doesn't violate someone else's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness, there's a lot of activity that's protected by the Constitution. I suppose the "pursuit of happiness" part of things has a lot of wiggle-room.
Locally, some members of the QC Badnarik in 2004 meetup group did some banner-waving action at a busy QC intersection this morning. I believe they are planning on doing it next weekend. I'm glad to hear it because there was not a chance in hell that I could make it this morning. Honk if you love liberty!
Locally, some members of the QC Badnarik in 2004 meetup group did some banner-waving action at a busy QC intersection this morning. I believe they are planning on doing it next weekend. I'm glad to hear it because there was not a chance in hell that I could make it this morning. Honk if you love liberty!
Friday, October 22, 2004
Suzanne might want to kick my butt for saying it, but it's a rousing song from that new satirical movie...
"America! Fuck Yeah!"
Yes, we went and saw the latest sacrilege from the guys who brought South Park into the world. This movie is extraordinarily vulgar (surprise), so if that's not your cup of tea, you're best served by skipping it. If you can look past the raunchy side of things, this movie approaches hilarity defined. I've gathered that a lot of people don't think this made as much fun of "right wing nut jobs" as it poked "liberal wieners" in the eye. I see it differently. The over-the-top absurdity of the "heroes" in this flick is the finger pointed at the neo-con types. Again, if you can look past the "naughty" parts of this movie (and there are plenty), you might get a laugh.
Now for raunchiness of a different sort...
I checked my Yahoo! mail right before I went to sleep this morning and the Bulk box was empty. When we got home a little after five, there were 23 new junk messages. See? What a crock of crap!
Surprise, surprise!
11 days! Don't forget to go vote!
Yes, we went and saw the latest sacrilege from the guys who brought South Park into the world. This movie is extraordinarily vulgar (surprise), so if that's not your cup of tea, you're best served by skipping it. If you can look past the raunchy side of things, this movie approaches hilarity defined. I've gathered that a lot of people don't think this made as much fun of "right wing nut jobs" as it poked "liberal wieners" in the eye. I see it differently. The over-the-top absurdity of the "heroes" in this flick is the finger pointed at the neo-con types. Again, if you can look past the "naughty" parts of this movie (and there are plenty), you might get a laugh.
Now for raunchiness of a different sort...
I checked my Yahoo! mail right before I went to sleep this morning and the Bulk box was empty. When we got home a little after five, there were 23 new junk messages. See? What a crock of crap!
Surprise, surprise!
11 days! Don't forget to go vote!
Thursday, October 21, 2004
What's new and exciting here?
To be bluntly honest, not a whole lot! Suzanne's working for a bit tomorrow and I'm prepping myself for the vamp shift. I actually like working the midnight hours because I frequently find myself (especially when I'm off for six days) staying up at night anyway. Perhaps I'm a vampire...nahh!
I'm hoping that Suzanne will find out that she'll be able to return to a Monday-Friday shift tomorrow. That way, we'll be able to go see Team America: World Police. Seeing it while I'm working nights will be too much of a pain in the arse.
There is some exciting stuff going on in Bamaland. Congratulations!
I'm hoping that Suzanne will find out that she'll be able to return to a Monday-Friday shift tomorrow. That way, we'll be able to go see Team America: World Police. Seeing it while I'm working nights will be too much of a pain in the arse.
There is some exciting stuff going on in Bamaland. Congratulations!
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
I like to know things in the context in which they happened...
One reason is that the politicians of the world seem to like to distort things a little. The earliest reference I can find to this year's flu vaccine issues is from late August. Chiron said there were issues but they expected to be able to make up for it by early October. I'm willing to bet that our government took that announcement at face value. This issue isn't quite as easy as certain candidates for President are trying to make it seem. Anything to raise the Nov. 2 tally...
The contamination (I'm sure that you well-read people out there already know this) in this batch of vaccine was Serratia marcescens. I find it interesting that our government used it for bio-weapons research and presumably caused a drastic increase in pneumonia and urinary tract infections in and around the San Fran Bay Area in the 1950s. More on that can be found here.
Our bank offers downloadable account transaction records in three different formats. One of them is Excel. I don't have Excel on my laptop (I do have Open Office). Every time I was attempting to download a spreadsheet, IE crashed. I figured Open Office might automatically take care of it. I forgot to tell Windows to use Open Office to open .xls files. Another way to go about things is to download one (or more) of the MS Office file viewers from here. I downloaded the viewer and changed all associations to use Open Office. It's not that the viewers don't work. I just want to be able to manipulate the data and the viewers only let you look.
The contamination (I'm sure that you well-read people out there already know this) in this batch of vaccine was Serratia marcescens. I find it interesting that our government used it for bio-weapons research and presumably caused a drastic increase in pneumonia and urinary tract infections in and around the San Fran Bay Area in the 1950s. More on that can be found here.
Our bank offers downloadable account transaction records in three different formats. One of them is Excel. I don't have Excel on my laptop (I do have Open Office). Every time I was attempting to download a spreadsheet, IE crashed. I figured Open Office might automatically take care of it. I forgot to tell Windows to use Open Office to open .xls files. Another way to go about things is to download one (or more) of the MS Office file viewers from here. I downloaded the viewer and changed all associations to use Open Office. It's not that the viewers don't work. I just want to be able to manipulate the data and the viewers only let you look.
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
Addition to earlier gack...
We can also support our military men and women while asking the idiot politicians here at home what the hell they are doing sending troops to a hotbed like Iraq without enough vital equipment. Take that to heart, Henry Hyde. Yes, I am on one side. I call it the American side. I don't know what these buffoons are thinking when they suggest that criticism of the war or policies that led to it are unpatriotic or that the criticism gives the enemy aid and comfort. I actually do know what they are thinking, but they are wrong. Henry Hyde... you and your ilk can kindly kiss my ass.
If this is true, I might be screwed...
Is it bad to drink nearly a gallon of coffee every day?
I haven't talked much about the unit in Iraq that refused to perform a mission. Sometimes, risk just comes with the territory. However, I find it appalling that three years into the "war on terror" and a year and a half into the Iraqi excursion, troops aren't supplied with the best equipment. When does it become obvious that something more drastic needs to be done because even the leaders on the ground (and the people in Congress) know that things could be made safer? Families (or the soldiers guarding privately contracted individuals who make significantly more than they do) shouldn't have to buy their own body armor. Granted, John Kerry could have voted for the 87 billion after he voted for it, but we can't afford to be half-ass supporting our troops when they are fighting for the freedom of other countries. I'm still of the opinion that it isn't the job of our soldiers be freeing other countries.
Some blame must be placed on Kerry and all the others who voted yes (and are now bitching about the war) and essentially gave away their Constitutionally mandated power to declare war.
Rather than believe that the sky is falling because of a flu vaccine shortage, get the facts. It is bullshit that our supply is low but it's not the end of the world and it's not necessarily the fault of either of the two biggest BSers in this campaign. This whole flu thing did lead to John Edwards asking a funny rhetorical question... "And he couldn’t even manage this latest flu vaccine crisis. How can we trust him to deal with anthrax?" Nice. You still don't have my vote John Edwards, but that was hilarious. The Kerry-Edwards ticket couldn't do much better.
Sellam Ismail was on The Screen Savers this evening. He's responsible for this and this. That inspired me to seek out vintage public access systems accessible via the net. First and foremost, I can't say how cool SDF is. There are others. I just found the Deathrow OpenVMS cluster. Interesting...
I haven't talked much about the unit in Iraq that refused to perform a mission. Sometimes, risk just comes with the territory. However, I find it appalling that three years into the "war on terror" and a year and a half into the Iraqi excursion, troops aren't supplied with the best equipment. When does it become obvious that something more drastic needs to be done because even the leaders on the ground (and the people in Congress) know that things could be made safer? Families (or the soldiers guarding privately contracted individuals who make significantly more than they do) shouldn't have to buy their own body armor. Granted, John Kerry could have voted for the 87 billion after he voted for it, but we can't afford to be half-ass supporting our troops when they are fighting for the freedom of other countries. I'm still of the opinion that it isn't the job of our soldiers be freeing other countries.
Some blame must be placed on Kerry and all the others who voted yes (and are now bitching about the war) and essentially gave away their Constitutionally mandated power to declare war.
Rather than believe that the sky is falling because of a flu vaccine shortage, get the facts. It is bullshit that our supply is low but it's not the end of the world and it's not necessarily the fault of either of the two biggest BSers in this campaign. This whole flu thing did lead to John Edwards asking a funny rhetorical question... "And he couldn’t even manage this latest flu vaccine crisis. How can we trust him to deal with anthrax?" Nice. You still don't have my vote John Edwards, but that was hilarious. The Kerry-Edwards ticket couldn't do much better.
Sellam Ismail was on The Screen Savers this evening. He's responsible for this and this. That inspired me to seek out vintage public access systems accessible via the net. First and foremost, I can't say how cool SDF is. There are others. I just found the Deathrow OpenVMS cluster. Interesting...
Sunday, October 17, 2004
Damn, I just thought about something...
I won't have much to bitch about after this campaign season is over. PSYCH! That's poppycock. Old Ron Northcutt stated it better. He would've said, "Auwww hell, that's horsesheeit!" Either of the two likely victors of November 2nd should keep my bitch session in progress for at least four more years.
What do we have here (PDF document)? Yes, it's another victory for free speech and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. I have a feeling that the more controversial portions of the Patriot Act will be dying a slow death over the next couple of years. Of course, there will be people trying to convince us that everything about Patriot is benign.
Perusing through a few blogs this evening (actually found at one in particular), I found this political test. Yeah, it's a front for a dating site, but I figured what the hell! Care to hear how I was described? I did take it a second time because I didn't think to mention how it described me earlier. Oddly enough, it said that I was a Libertarian the first time. The second time....
"You are a
Social Liberal
(88% permissive)
and an...
Economic Conservative
(93% permissive)
You are best described as a:
Anarchist
You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness."
Hmmmmm.....
What do we have here (PDF document)? Yes, it's another victory for free speech and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. I have a feeling that the more controversial portions of the Patriot Act will be dying a slow death over the next couple of years. Of course, there will be people trying to convince us that everything about Patriot is benign.
Perusing through a few blogs this evening (actually found at one in particular), I found this political test. Yeah, it's a front for a dating site, but I figured what the hell! Care to hear how I was described? I did take it a second time because I didn't think to mention how it described me earlier. Oddly enough, it said that I was a Libertarian the first time. The second time....
"You are a
Social Liberal
(88% permissive)
and an...
Economic Conservative
(93% permissive)
You are best described as a:
Anarchist
You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness."
Hmmmmm.....
Saturday, October 16, 2004
Gotta love those 12-hour days...
Actually, I like them and I hate them. I adore them because they afford me and my homies at work the chance to have a six-day stretch off. When I'm working them, I am sometimes less than fond of them because Suzanne works during the day and I don't get home until around 7 PM. At least the 12-hour days beat the 12-hour nights.
We just had time to eat dinner this evening and go fetch some ice. While we were eating (and when we got back from fetching), I saw one of the scariest reminders that we are indeed growing older. I tried to avert my eyes from Growing Pains: Return of the Seavers as much as possible.
The election season is nearly over and I'm tired of it. I'm also tired of the latest controversy (Kerry's example using Darth Cheney's daughter). Yes, it was a politically inspired barb. It may or may not have been planned. However, if the Grand Uniter and friends weren't so hell-bent on passing an amendment designed to deny a certain group of people freedom to live as they choose (at no harm to others), we wouldn't be having this little problem. My marriage isn't threatened by this. What's next, a federal marriage license?
Hahaha! Save for traveling, I currently have no use for a cell phone. Suzanne has one and we use it when we are traveling. The only problem I could see with this is if someone had an emergency call or was waiting for an important call. However, don't most modern cell phones have a "vibrate" feature? Our father...[ring-ring-ring], who art in Heaven, [opening chords of Beethoven's Fifth]...hallowed be thy [insert your own ring tone here] name...
I don't get spyware on my home machines. I can't say the same about some of our machines at work. I don't know if it's just irresponsible clicking, lack of attention, or stupid downloading habits, but one machine was swamped. Fortunately, I was able to de-louse the 'puter in question. I'm sure it will be bogged down again soon. The odd thing is that the AV solution that my company uses says it protects against some of the programs that were present. I firmly believe that in most cases, the user will remain the weakest link. Tech will be part of the solution, but there are clever folks out there who will figure away around the tech. The easiest way around the tech is often right through the user.
Well, I should probably skedaddle. Suzanne works way too early and I'll be off on a merry 12-hour adventure. Nighty-night!
We just had time to eat dinner this evening and go fetch some ice. While we were eating (and when we got back from fetching), I saw one of the scariest reminders that we are indeed growing older. I tried to avert my eyes from Growing Pains: Return of the Seavers as much as possible.
The election season is nearly over and I'm tired of it. I'm also tired of the latest controversy (Kerry's example using Darth Cheney's daughter). Yes, it was a politically inspired barb. It may or may not have been planned. However, if the Grand Uniter and friends weren't so hell-bent on passing an amendment designed to deny a certain group of people freedom to live as they choose (at no harm to others), we wouldn't be having this little problem. My marriage isn't threatened by this. What's next, a federal marriage license?
Hahaha! Save for traveling, I currently have no use for a cell phone. Suzanne has one and we use it when we are traveling. The only problem I could see with this is if someone had an emergency call or was waiting for an important call. However, don't most modern cell phones have a "vibrate" feature? Our father...[ring-ring-ring], who art in Heaven, [opening chords of Beethoven's Fifth]...hallowed be thy [insert your own ring tone here] name...
I don't get spyware on my home machines. I can't say the same about some of our machines at work. I don't know if it's just irresponsible clicking, lack of attention, or stupid downloading habits, but one machine was swamped. Fortunately, I was able to de-louse the 'puter in question. I'm sure it will be bogged down again soon. The odd thing is that the AV solution that my company uses says it protects against some of the programs that were present. I firmly believe that in most cases, the user will remain the weakest link. Tech will be part of the solution, but there are clever folks out there who will figure away around the tech. The easiest way around the tech is often right through the user.
Well, I should probably skedaddle. Suzanne works way too early and I'll be off on a merry 12-hour adventure. Nighty-night!
Thursday, October 14, 2004
Ivan Shamiakin died today...
I had no idea who that was either. I just wanted to see if any notable deaths had occurred today. There's a limited selection of Shamiakin stories here (one German, one English, three Russian). I'm going to read the English one.
Yahoo! appears to have recently made more of their news content available via RSS. The speaker at Gnomedex said they would be increasing the amount of RSS material available. We also received Yahoo! Search mousepads as schwag in Tahoe. To see the shortcuts to use with Yahoo!'s search instead of that other one (which I totally dig), click here.
We caught wind of this at work today via e-mail. This is a prime example of what we'd call a teamwork failure. Nuclear operators work long and weird hours at times. We're supposed to help each other and make sure that we keep doing it right (e.g. staying awake). Nuclear worker fatigue is not a new issue by any means (as can be ascertained here). I just hope that the actions of one sleepy individual don't get the proposed working hour restrictions being suggested by this group rushed into place. We try our utmost to keep each other out of trouble where I work.
Yahoo! appears to have recently made more of their news content available via RSS. The speaker at Gnomedex said they would be increasing the amount of RSS material available. We also received Yahoo! Search mousepads as schwag in Tahoe. To see the shortcuts to use with Yahoo!'s search instead of that other one (which I totally dig), click here.
We caught wind of this at work today via e-mail. This is a prime example of what we'd call a teamwork failure. Nuclear operators work long and weird hours at times. We're supposed to help each other and make sure that we keep doing it right (e.g. staying awake). Nuclear worker fatigue is not a new issue by any means (as can be ascertained here). I just hope that the actions of one sleepy individual don't get the proposed working hour restrictions being suggested by this group rushed into place. We try our utmost to keep each other out of trouble where I work.
Ever in the mood to try something new, I downloaded this cool THING.
Thank you Thing.
What is this thing, you ask?
I've downloaded the Google Desktop search tool.
Oh yeah... one other cool thing I've downloaded recently is IZArc. Why do I like it? Here's one part of the answer:
"IZArc is the ultimate archive utility suports many archive formats like: 7-ZIP, A, ACE, ARC, ARJ, B64, BH, BZ2, BZA, CAB, CPIO, DEB, ENC, GCA, GZ, GZA, HA, JAR, LHA, LIB, LZH, MBF, MIM, PAK, PK3, RAR, RPM, TAR, TAZ, TBZ, TGZ, TZ, UUE, WAR, XXE, YZ1, Z, ZIP, ZOO."
The price is right (free, although I'll strongly consider supporting their work monetarily), the install was quick and easy, and from what I can tell, IZArc can decompress most anything. Very cool!
Perhaps more later...
What is this thing, you ask?
I've downloaded the Google Desktop search tool.
Oh yeah... one other cool thing I've downloaded recently is IZArc. Why do I like it? Here's one part of the answer:
"IZArc is the ultimate archive utility suports many archive formats like: 7-ZIP, A, ACE, ARC, ARJ, B64, BH, BZ2, BZA, CAB, CPIO, DEB, ENC, GCA, GZ, GZA, HA, JAR, LHA, LIB, LZH, MBF, MIM, PAK, PK3, RAR, RPM, TAR, TAZ, TBZ, TGZ, TZ, UUE, WAR, XXE, YZ1, Z, ZIP, ZOO."
The price is right (free, although I'll strongly consider supporting their work monetarily), the install was quick and easy, and from what I can tell, IZArc can decompress most anything. Very cool!
Perhaps more later...
Wednesday, October 13, 2004
I do NOT support John Kerry. I do NOT support George Bush.
However, hearing Dubya and Bill Frist (post-debate) say that John Kerry has done nothing in 20 years is getting slightly shallow, old, and seemingly misleading. I don't know how Kerry's record compares to that of any other Senator. However, he has sponsored bills and amendments to bills. Click on the links below to see the list of bills, amendments, and/or resolutions that Kerry has sponsored since 1985:
99th Congress (1985-1986)
100th Congress (1987-1988)
101st Congress (1989-1990)
102nd Congress (1991-1992)
103rd Congress (1993-1994)
104th Congress (1995-1996)
105th Congress (1997-1998)
106th Congress (1999-2000)
107th Congress (2001-2002)
108th Congress (2003-2004)
In order to maintain a hint of objectivity, I must note that I can't think of a bill with Kerry's name on it as I can with McCain-Feingold, Sarbanes-Oxley, or Nunn-Lugar-Domenici. However, that doesn't mean he's been windsurfing for 20 years...
99th Congress (1985-1986)
100th Congress (1987-1988)
101st Congress (1989-1990)
102nd Congress (1991-1992)
103rd Congress (1993-1994)
104th Congress (1995-1996)
105th Congress (1997-1998)
106th Congress (1999-2000)
107th Congress (2001-2002)
108th Congress (2003-2004)
In order to maintain a hint of objectivity, I must note that I can't think of a bill with Kerry's name on it as I can with McCain-Feingold, Sarbanes-Oxley, or Nunn-Lugar-Domenici. However, that doesn't mean he's been windsurfing for 20 years...
Yeah, today was (and still is) pretty mundane...
Well, at least it was mundane once I woke up. I'm ready to go back to work. Excepting the 12 hours of OT I worked on Sunday night, I've been off since last Friday morning. Today is the beginning of Suzanne's weekend.
Can you imagine what life will be like for Lynndie's baby if she gets hammered at her court martial?
Speaking of the Iraqi abuse...
The RAND Corporation released a paper earlier this year titled Public Diplomacy: How to Think About and Improve It (.pdf file). I'm sure that Lynndie and her compadres didn't do much for America's image. The paper brings up some of the works of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Nelson Mandela. There are some great online repositories that include some of their respective works here and here.
I was considering watching the debates this evening, but we're not going to. First, Suzanne says she would be bored to tears. Second, most of the things we'll hear have been said repeatedly for at least the past ten months. Third, I've lost interest...
I haven't lost interest in seeing that Mike gets votes. Unfortunately, I won't be able to take part in the activities of the QC Badnarik Meetup group this weekend. This happens to be the weekend when they plan to hit the streets waving Badnarik signs. However, duty calls and seeing that I recently returned from vacation, I can't justify taking the time off this weekend. Drat!
I'm glad to hear that the US Supreme Court will tackle "Ten Commandments" issues. That could get interesting.
Well, I've gotta run. Suzanne's jonesing to get to Outback.
Can you imagine what life will be like for Lynndie's baby if she gets hammered at her court martial?
Speaking of the Iraqi abuse...
The RAND Corporation released a paper earlier this year titled Public Diplomacy: How to Think About and Improve It (.pdf file). I'm sure that Lynndie and her compadres didn't do much for America's image. The paper brings up some of the works of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Nelson Mandela. There are some great online repositories that include some of their respective works here and here.
I was considering watching the debates this evening, but we're not going to. First, Suzanne says she would be bored to tears. Second, most of the things we'll hear have been said repeatedly for at least the past ten months. Third, I've lost interest...
I haven't lost interest in seeing that Mike gets votes. Unfortunately, I won't be able to take part in the activities of the QC Badnarik Meetup group this weekend. This happens to be the weekend when they plan to hit the streets waving Badnarik signs. However, duty calls and seeing that I recently returned from vacation, I can't justify taking the time off this weekend. Drat!
I'm glad to hear that the US Supreme Court will tackle "Ten Commandments" issues. That could get interesting.
Well, I've gotta run. Suzanne's jonesing to get to Outback.
Monday, October 11, 2004
Suzanne was telling me that our niece called my in-laws today...
Our niece and her family had just returned from visiting Mickey Mouse. Olivia was telling my parents-in-law that today was a day off from school. I had no idea that today was a holiday (or at least local students had the day off). I suppose that the shiftwork addles my sense of time. 512 years... Damn, time flies!
Speaking of Christophers...
Go easy Kal-El!
Sean Penn... piss off! I really don't think that Trey and Matt are trying to encourage people not to vote. They might say something along those lines, but they are trying to be funny. That's what they do. Participating in the 2000 vote must have been a frustration to the 500,000 more people who voted for Gore over Dubya. The issue is even worse when you consider the usual complaints about "wishing for different options" and "voting for the lesser of two evils".
I love this picture. I was checking out Yahoo! news and I noticed that the lead picture in their news slideshow was a lioness carrying her cub from the Aalborg Zoo. That led me to the Aalborg Zoo website. I don't believe that I've ever gone to zoo sites looking for great animal pix. I love well-taken pictures of animals. I think it comes from having had a multi-volume animal encyclopedia set when I was younger. The pictures were gorgeous and the information about the animals was substantial for my age at the time.
Speaking of Christophers...
Go easy Kal-El!
Sean Penn... piss off! I really don't think that Trey and Matt are trying to encourage people not to vote. They might say something along those lines, but they are trying to be funny. That's what they do. Participating in the 2000 vote must have been a frustration to the 500,000 more people who voted for Gore over Dubya. The issue is even worse when you consider the usual complaints about "wishing for different options" and "voting for the lesser of two evils".
I love this picture. I was checking out Yahoo! news and I noticed that the lead picture in their news slideshow was a lioness carrying her cub from the Aalborg Zoo. That led me to the Aalborg Zoo website. I don't believe that I've ever gone to zoo sites looking for great animal pix. I love well-taken pictures of animals. I think it comes from having had a multi-volume animal encyclopedia set when I was younger. The pictures were gorgeous and the information about the animals was substantial for my age at the time.
Saturday, October 09, 2004
I have to apologize...
I realize that I might sometimes come off as a raving lunatic bastard when I post here (particularly when talking about those who are in charge). I'm not a raving mad individual. I'm just frustrated by the political duopoly machine at times. I love this place and I wouldn't live anywhere else. That being said, I feel it necessary to spread the word that there ARE alternatives. Yeah, I won't change anything. Not by myself. I've heard catchphrases like "I wish there was an alternative choice" so many times. There are alternatives. I have mine, but there are others. However, when an alternative is presented, many people often seem to stick with one of the big parties for fear of a wasted vote. I don't see it changing anytime soon.
Here's why I feel that's dangerous. Bush says he believes in the concepts embodied in the UN. He also says that we won't ask them for permission to defend our country. He is right there. At one time, Kerry said that our troops wouldn't be deployed without the blessing of the UN. More recently, he mentioned the "global test". That's BS! However, my take on things is that Bush's war on terror (and the one in Iraq) have the potential to (and are) leading us down a slippery slope of interventionist foreign policy. When I speak about my choice, one of the biggest complaints I hear invokes the demon of isolationism. It's true (somewhat). If my choice became reality, we would try as much as possible to extricate ourselves from the governmental affairs of the rest of the world. I don't feel that that's a bad thing. We've opened and rubbed wounds in the interest of the US for the past one hundred years. Stepping back wouldn't end terrorism, but it would allow us to focus better and let us stop rubbing SOME of the wounds that, while not causing terrorism, aggravate the situation.
Is Gnomedex 5 in the works already? If we can make it next year, we will.
Well, I don't know what happened to the DHS Daily Reports culled from the news media at www.nipc.gov. If you're interested in those types of matters, there was some interesting info culled from the news and put all in one place. This source has reports that appear to be maintained.
Here's why I feel that's dangerous. Bush says he believes in the concepts embodied in the UN. He also says that we won't ask them for permission to defend our country. He is right there. At one time, Kerry said that our troops wouldn't be deployed without the blessing of the UN. More recently, he mentioned the "global test". That's BS! However, my take on things is that Bush's war on terror (and the one in Iraq) have the potential to (and are) leading us down a slippery slope of interventionist foreign policy. When I speak about my choice, one of the biggest complaints I hear invokes the demon of isolationism. It's true (somewhat). If my choice became reality, we would try as much as possible to extricate ourselves from the governmental affairs of the rest of the world. I don't feel that that's a bad thing. We've opened and rubbed wounds in the interest of the US for the past one hundred years. Stepping back wouldn't end terrorism, but it would allow us to focus better and let us stop rubbing SOME of the wounds that, while not causing terrorism, aggravate the situation.
Is Gnomedex 5 in the works already? If we can make it next year, we will.
Well, I don't know what happened to the DHS Daily Reports culled from the news media at www.nipc.gov. If you're interested in those types of matters, there was some interesting info culled from the news and put all in one place. This source has reports that appear to be maintained.
Friday, October 08, 2004
The mainstream news won't talk about alternative events that happened outside of tonight's debate so I will...
The candidates of the Libertarian and Green parties were arrested while attempting to gain access to the Presidential debate this evening. These two men are Constitutionally eligible and have sufficient ballot access to be theoretically capable of winning. The catch-22 experienced by these alternatives is extraordinary. They won't be admitted to the debates as run by the Commission on Presidential Debates because they don't poll at an arbitrary 15% in national polls. They will never get there unless the Libertarians (or Greens) get a candidate who is filthy rich or ultra-famous. This is sad. Voices are being squashed.
For the Libertarian account, read here.
For the account from the Green Party, read here.
For the Libertarian account, read here.
For the account from the Green Party, read here.
Thursday, October 07, 2004
Intel bonanza doesn't lend a great deal of credibility to Dubya and company...
The past two days have seen some interesting information come to light. The first was the news about a CIA report that found no conclusive evidence of ties between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Saddam Hussein. The second is the massive report about Saddam's WMD. I haven't read any of the material I am linking to yet because I have the pleasure of going in to work soon. The prepared testimony of Charles Duelfer and Brigadier General Joseph J. McMenamin, USMC before the Senate Armed Services Committee can be downloaded here.
We truly have a great country. Information like this is frequently available in near real-time when it's not being subjected to highly restrictive secrecy barriers. Sometimes those barriers are necessary.
The CIA has a wealth of useful information available on its website.
Although we don't hear much about the Mars Rovers anymore, they are still alive and kickin'. I almost forgot that our names are in the cosmos. Here's my proof. Here's Suzanne's.
Well, I have to run. Bye!
We truly have a great country. Information like this is frequently available in near real-time when it's not being subjected to highly restrictive secrecy barriers. Sometimes those barriers are necessary.
The CIA has a wealth of useful information available on its website.
Although we don't hear much about the Mars Rovers anymore, they are still alive and kickin'. I almost forgot that our names are in the cosmos. Here's my proof. Here's Suzanne's.
Well, I have to run. Bye!
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
As I've noted before, the cable news channel we typically stick with is MSNBC...
However, like every other news channel, as soon as the candidate debates are over, they analyze them to death in search of the elusive answer to the question of who won. What follows here is only my opinion, so please take it as such. I feel that the American voter has lost. There are a few undecideds left out there. They have probably waited for these debates as part of their decision-making process. What they are getting is a sanitized, scripted, and lackluster rewording of the stump speeches that we've all been hearing for close to a year now. Hell, check out the Memorandum of Understanding for this year's farce. The candidates can't directly question each other or participate in any alternative debates. I won't even mention what I think of the fact that Constitutionally qualified candidates with sufficient ballot access are excluded.
The Nobels for Physics, Chemistry, and Physiology/Medicine have been announced. The awards for Literature, Peace, and the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel are due to be announced on October 7th, 8th, and 11th respectively. The Nobel site has some excellent material (or links to material) on Nobel winners.
The ACLU has a great portion of their website devoted to the Patriot Act and FOIA material they have obtained regarding Patriot. Searching through some of it, I found this chart of what the government can and can't do and under what circumstances. You've got to love the net!
The Nobels for Physics, Chemistry, and Physiology/Medicine have been announced. The awards for Literature, Peace, and the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel are due to be announced on October 7th, 8th, and 11th respectively. The Nobel site has some excellent material (or links to material) on Nobel winners.
The ACLU has a great portion of their website devoted to the Patriot Act and FOIA material they have obtained regarding Patriot. Searching through some of it, I found this chart of what the government can and can't do and under what circumstances. You've got to love the net!
This is a test...
This station is conducting a test of the Email Blogcast System. This is only a
test. In the event that this had been a real post....yada-yada-yada. You get
it.
test. In the event that this had been a real post....yada-yada-yada. You get
it.
Tuesday, October 05, 2004
RIP Rodney...
Now to less important news...
We're actually watching the debate between Cheney and Edwards. Suzanne isn't watching very much. It would be cool if Edwards brought up Halliburton and Cheney dropped the F-bomb again. At least Cheney isn't making goofy looks of exasperation...
Speaking of the F-bomb...I was filtering through some of the IP traffic to my site. I noticed that several of the IPs were from Saudi Arabia. Without thinking much about it, I went searching through some of the IP range. It just so happens that I have IE titled with...let's just say a very colorful title. Hopefully I won't offend anybody who will be reading their logs. Must...use...Firefox...
Speaking of Firefox...Give it a shot!
John Edwards is bitching about outsourcing and John Kerry voted for NAFTA in 1993. I suppose that's similar to Cheney's disagreement with Dubya about the Federal Marriage Amendment. Viva la revolucion! When I mention to people that I'm voting Libertarian, people ask the inevitable question about a wasted vote. I always opine that a vote for either of the political juggernauts is a waste.
In closing, keep an eye out here.
We're actually watching the debate between Cheney and Edwards. Suzanne isn't watching very much. It would be cool if Edwards brought up Halliburton and Cheney dropped the F-bomb again. At least Cheney isn't making goofy looks of exasperation...
Speaking of the F-bomb...I was filtering through some of the IP traffic to my site. I noticed that several of the IPs were from Saudi Arabia. Without thinking much about it, I went searching through some of the IP range. It just so happens that I have IE titled with...let's just say a very colorful title. Hopefully I won't offend anybody who will be reading their logs. Must...use...Firefox...
Speaking of Firefox...Give it a shot!
John Edwards is bitching about outsourcing and John Kerry voted for NAFTA in 1993. I suppose that's similar to Cheney's disagreement with Dubya about the Federal Marriage Amendment. Viva la revolucion! When I mention to people that I'm voting Libertarian, people ask the inevitable question about a wasted vote. I always opine that a vote for either of the political juggernauts is a waste.
In closing, keep an eye out here.
Monday, October 04, 2004
We DID make it home safely last night around 8:30 PM...
The plane ride was fairly uneventful but driving damn near straight into the sun while leaving Chi-town in the thick of traffic was quite a feat. Suzanne and I thought that Gnomedex kicked ass. As usual, I don't normally meet a whole lot of new people when I go to something like this because I hang around with Suzanne and beyond that, I'm fairly introverted. I am pleased to have met and chatted up Jim and Michael. Additionally, meeting and talking to the individuals responsible for majorgeeks.com was A-OK! We're already raring to go next year...
One thing that a rep from Yahoo! brought up on the closing night was their newly retooled "My Yahoo!" portal. I was using it before we even went to Lake Tahoe. One ultra-cool feature they have set up is the ability to integrate RSS feeds right into your own "My Yahoo!" page. You can also do this with your favorite blog(s). See?
Obviously, you have to be signed up on Yahoo! to use the features available, but it's nice to be able to view the latest headlines and blog posts all in one convenient spot. If you do sign up, be sure to visit your account page and set up the "marketing preferences" as necessary.
I knew I should have called in last night to see if I was supposed to work today. As it happens, I didn't. Oh well, I was in and out very quickly.
One last thing... If you run Windows and want a good graphics editing program on the cheap, think about getting GIMP for Windows. When I was trying out Linux on my desktop, I used The GIMP and I loved it. Having played around with it for a few hours this afternoon, I was reminded of the fairly extensive feature set that it has.
One thing that a rep from Yahoo! brought up on the closing night was their newly retooled "My Yahoo!" portal. I was using it before we even went to Lake Tahoe. One ultra-cool feature they have set up is the ability to integrate RSS feeds right into your own "My Yahoo!" page. You can also do this with your favorite blog(s). See?
Obviously, you have to be signed up on Yahoo! to use the features available, but it's nice to be able to view the latest headlines and blog posts all in one convenient spot. If you do sign up, be sure to visit your account page and set up the "marketing preferences" as necessary.
I knew I should have called in last night to see if I was supposed to work today. As it happens, I didn't. Oh well, I was in and out very quickly.
One last thing... If you run Windows and want a good graphics editing program on the cheap, think about getting GIMP for Windows. When I was trying out Linux on my desktop, I used The GIMP and I loved it. Having played around with it for a few hours this afternoon, I was reminded of the fairly extensive feature set that it has.
Saturday, October 02, 2004
I didn't wake up until 8:30 this morning.
After Suzanne went back up to the room, I was still feeling froggy. I went back down to the Gnomedex lobby area and chatted with Mike for well over an hour. As the 2 AM witching hour approached, I wasn't yet ready to call it a night. I didn't really feel much like hitting the streets so I checked out the dance club in the hotel. I didn't crash until four in the morning. Suzanne finally succeeded in waking me up at 8:30 this morning. Now I'm whipped! I'm exceedingly happy that there's a Starbuck's in the hotel lobby.
Can I please call it Faux News now?
This wasn't actually posted until 10:30 AM Tahoe time. I tried like hell to get it up last night (keep your mind out of the gutter), but I was having no luck at all. This is what I was thinking around midnight last night.
I realize that this isn't the norm, but I'm still frequently bothered by Fox News. I'm not bothered by their opinion-based prime-time programming. I'm bothered by the whole "Fair and Balanced" thing. Hell, it doesn't matter much anyway. I watch MSNBC at home because I find Keith Olbermann to be extraordinarily entertaining.
Sad news...
It's exceedingly sad that Lori Hacking's body has been found, but it might be possible to find slight solace in the fact that she can now be given a proper burial.
Suzanne and I went to our room after the band finished and the prize giveaways were done. We watched a little bit of the vidiot box but I was feeling fairly antsy. I'm still antsy. I convinced her that we could at least head down to where we have free wi-fi. The area has mainly cleared out, but there are a few people left yakking about everything tech under the sun. Entertaining...
If you haven't heard by now, John Kerry and El Dubya had a little debate on Thursday evening. I didn't watch a great deal of it because the canned responses would have probably pissed me off. David Cobb and Michael Badnarik also had a debate on Thursday evening. Who are those guys? A free registration (including details like phone number) is required at the Free-Market News Network, but they have archived video of the debate between Cobb and Badnarik. It's entirely too bad that Badnarik and Cobb won't be seen with Dubya and JFK. What do you expect, a democratic process?
I realize that this isn't the norm, but I'm still frequently bothered by Fox News. I'm not bothered by their opinion-based prime-time programming. I'm bothered by the whole "Fair and Balanced" thing. Hell, it doesn't matter much anyway. I watch MSNBC at home because I find Keith Olbermann to be extraordinarily entertaining.
Sad news...
It's exceedingly sad that Lori Hacking's body has been found, but it might be possible to find slight solace in the fact that she can now be given a proper burial.
Suzanne and I went to our room after the band finished and the prize giveaways were done. We watched a little bit of the vidiot box but I was feeling fairly antsy. I'm still antsy. I convinced her that we could at least head down to where we have free wi-fi. The area has mainly cleared out, but there are a few people left yakking about everything tech under the sun. Entertaining...
If you haven't heard by now, John Kerry and El Dubya had a little debate on Thursday evening. I didn't watch a great deal of it because the canned responses would have probably pissed me off. David Cobb and Michael Badnarik also had a debate on Thursday evening. Who are those guys? A free registration (including details like phone number) is required at the Free-Market News Network, but they have archived video of the debate between Cobb and Badnarik. It's entirely too bad that Badnarik and Cobb won't be seen with Dubya and JFK. What do you expect, a democratic process?
Friday, October 01, 2004
Howwwwwwwwwwwwwwdy-ho!
It's pretty much the end of the first official day of Gnomedex. The schedule for the day was as listed at the Geeks Gone Wild conference schedule for October 1. This is the third year that we have attended Gnomedex. The previous years had individual speakers speaking one at a time. The previous years saw individuals like Leo Laporte, Doc Searls, John C. Dvorak, Rob Malda, and a number of other people speaking. The format for this year was panels. I enjoyed the format change. This years speakers are listed at the schedule link above. I enjoyed the dialogue generated by having the panels. The Silicon Valley Houserockers are rockin' the house and being interrupted every once in a while by the folks from Via who are bound and determined to hand out a crapload of prizes and Gnomedex swag. That's cool!
Thursday, September 30, 2004
Well, we made it to Gnomedex relatively unscathed!
Here are the first pictures I've taken. They're not awesome or anything, but they're a start.
Wednesday, September 29, 2004
Dude, our hotel in Chicago (Des Plaines actually) has an Indian TV channel with Indian soaps...
OK, so that's not really quite my speed (or Suzanne's). In fact, she just flipped the channel. I'm normally the one who wants to gain knowledge (or at least hear the news) by watching the idiot box.
Congratulations to Judge Victor Marrero. He's the judge who wrote today's opinion that portions of Patriot's investigation rules and non-disclosure requirements are un-Constitutional. Here's the conclusion:
"To summarize, the Court concludes that the compulsory, secret, and unreviewable production of information required by the FBI's application of 18 U.S.C. § 2709 violates the Fourth Amendment, and that the non-disclosure provision of 18 U.S.C. § 2709(c) violates the First Amendment. The government is therefore enjoined from issuing NSLs under § 2709 or from enforcing the non-disclosure provision in this or any other case, but enforcement of the Court's judgment will be stayed pending appeal, or if no appeal is filed, for 90 days."
I don't hate the government or any of the people we have elected (or hopefully might send packing back to Crawford). I just drastically disagree with them and I think they want too much space in our lives. Patriot was a knee-jerk reaction after an extraordinarily traumatic event. It's time to go back to the drawing board and make sure that we are protected but safe under the Constitution. John ("To those who pit Americans against immigrants, and citizens against non-citizens, to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America's enemies and pause to America’s friends. They encourage people of good will to remain silent in the face of evil. Our efforts have been crafted carefully to avoid infringing on constitutional rights while saving American lives.") Ashcroft's phantoms might be real after all.
If you're wondering about that 18 U.S.C. § 2709 thing, look no further than this link.
Lake Tahoe, we're almost on the way!
Congratulations to Judge Victor Marrero. He's the judge who wrote today's opinion that portions of Patriot's investigation rules and non-disclosure requirements are un-Constitutional. Here's the conclusion:
"To summarize, the Court concludes that the compulsory, secret, and unreviewable production of information required by the FBI's application of 18 U.S.C. § 2709 violates the Fourth Amendment, and that the non-disclosure provision of 18 U.S.C. § 2709(c) violates the First Amendment. The government is therefore enjoined from issuing NSLs under § 2709 or from enforcing the non-disclosure provision in this or any other case, but enforcement of the Court's judgment will be stayed pending appeal, or if no appeal is filed, for 90 days."
I don't hate the government or any of the people we have elected (or hopefully might send packing back to Crawford). I just drastically disagree with them and I think they want too much space in our lives. Patriot was a knee-jerk reaction after an extraordinarily traumatic event. It's time to go back to the drawing board and make sure that we are protected but safe under the Constitution. John ("To those who pit Americans against immigrants, and citizens against non-citizens, to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve. They give ammunition to America's enemies and pause to America’s friends. They encourage people of good will to remain silent in the face of evil. Our efforts have been crafted carefully to avoid infringing on constitutional rights while saving American lives.") Ashcroft's phantoms might be real after all.
If you're wondering about that 18 U.S.C. § 2709 thing, look no further than this link.
Lake Tahoe, we're almost on the way!
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Are the "war on terror" and/or our little adventure in Iraq a war against Islam?
I happen to believe that they come dangerously close. Why? No, it's not because the overwhelming majority of present day transnational terrorists are radical adherents of Islam. It's because of the things our country does. For some reason, many of our elected leaders feel morally responsible for ensuring that democracy, tolerance, diversity, and many other facets of our way of life take root and thrive in other countries. One of the latest examples was the 2004 report from the State Department on International Religious Freedom.
Why do I believe that America's overwhelming desire to see other countries accept freedom, diversity, and tolerance partially constitute a battle against Islam? Islam means submission. I believe that it would be possible for a predominantly Muslim country to hold free elections and follow parts of our way of life (if they desired). However, there are portions of life which are completely bound with the requirement to submit. That requirement for submission would preclude some of the tolerance and acceptance of diversity that many in the West see as prime virtues of a free society.
Our operation in Iraq was primarily based on "WMD". When it began to appear that WMD wouldn't be found, the thrust started to move to, "But we freed an oppressed people from a brutal dictator." Later on in the occupation, some talk of a Constitution based on Sharia law started to occur. We couldn't have that! Paul Bremer threatened to put the kibosh on that. Such a constitution wouldn't be in line with our desire to have a democracy in the Middle East.
The Michael Ledeens of the world try to brush aside the naysayers by using Reagan's "victory" against those damn pinko Commies as proof that America can and will force her values elsewhere in the world. What price did that come at? In the book Imperial Hubris, the anonymous author recollects a Senate hearing from the 80s in which a Senator acted surprised that the future Afghan leaders would be "anti-American Muslims". What enemies of our future are we supporting/creating in our current campaigns? Only time will tell...
There is a time to be brutally vicious. We've already missed on one count. Osama's head wouldn't be a magic bullet to stop the "war on terror". However, it would show that we're not screwing around when we say "dead or alive".
All of that gets away from the point that, for some reason, we think that the religious affairs of other countries need to be conducted as they are in America. That is arrogant. It also comes dangerously close to being "fightin' words".
Why do I believe that America's overwhelming desire to see other countries accept freedom, diversity, and tolerance partially constitute a battle against Islam? Islam means submission. I believe that it would be possible for a predominantly Muslim country to hold free elections and follow parts of our way of life (if they desired). However, there are portions of life which are completely bound with the requirement to submit. That requirement for submission would preclude some of the tolerance and acceptance of diversity that many in the West see as prime virtues of a free society.
Our operation in Iraq was primarily based on "WMD". When it began to appear that WMD wouldn't be found, the thrust started to move to, "But we freed an oppressed people from a brutal dictator." Later on in the occupation, some talk of a Constitution based on Sharia law started to occur. We couldn't have that! Paul Bremer threatened to put the kibosh on that. Such a constitution wouldn't be in line with our desire to have a democracy in the Middle East.
The Michael Ledeens of the world try to brush aside the naysayers by using Reagan's "victory" against those damn pinko Commies as proof that America can and will force her values elsewhere in the world. What price did that come at? In the book Imperial Hubris, the anonymous author recollects a Senate hearing from the 80s in which a Senator acted surprised that the future Afghan leaders would be "anti-American Muslims". What enemies of our future are we supporting/creating in our current campaigns? Only time will tell...
There is a time to be brutally vicious. We've already missed on one count. Osama's head wouldn't be a magic bullet to stop the "war on terror". However, it would show that we're not screwing around when we say "dead or alive".
All of that gets away from the point that, for some reason, we think that the religious affairs of other countries need to be conducted as they are in America. That is arrogant. It also comes dangerously close to being "fightin' words".
Monday, September 27, 2004
I've finally done it...
No, I haven't figured out the answer to any fundamental questions of life (e.g. "Why are we here?") yet. However, I finally got my Badnarik for President yard sign put in my front yard.
Take two...
My mother called during the initial airing of Persons of Interest. It was good to talk to her and she was wishing us a good trip to Gnomedex. I could have recorded it on the Replay earlier I suppose. I just didn't think about it...
So far, this show is pretty good. It's not a lightning-paced anti-terror flick. It's just the story of twelve of the thousands of people who were detained after 9/11. I'll break to actually pay attention to this documentary now.
Ta-ta!
Take two...
My mother called during the initial airing of Persons of Interest. It was good to talk to her and she was wishing us a good trip to Gnomedex. I could have recorded it on the Replay earlier I suppose. I just didn't think about it...
So far, this show is pretty good. It's not a lightning-paced anti-terror flick. It's just the story of twelve of the thousands of people who were detained after 9/11. I'll break to actually pay attention to this documentary now.
Ta-ta!
In the never-ending quest to find something interesting on the boob tube...
I was checking out this evening's listings. We normally watch The Screen Savers followed by Countdown on MSNBC. I was looking to see what comes on at 8 PM (Central). I noticed a documentary called Persons of Interest. We're going to watch that. It's too bad that this is currently only seeing airtime on The Sundance Channel. From the film's website, here's a brief description of what the show is about:
"After the Sept.11 terrorist attacks, more than 5,000 people, mainly non-U.S. nationals of South Asian or Middle Eastern origin, were taken into custody by the U.S. Justice Department and held indefinitely on grounds of national security. Muslim immigrants were subject to arbitrary arrest, secret detention, solitary confinement, and deportation. Many were denied access to legal representation and communication with their families. During a period when the U.S. government has made every effort to depersonalize these detentions, refusing to reveal the names or even the number of immigrants detained, the voices of those affected — their testimonials and experiences — become our only window into the human costs of post September 11th immigration policies. Following an unconventional format, Persons of Interest presents a series of encounters between former detainees and directors Alison Maclean (Jesus’ Son) and Tobias Perse in an empty room which serves both visually and symbolically as an interrogation room, home, and prison cell. Through interviews, family photographs, and letters from prison, the directors have fashioned a compelling and poignant film, allowing those affected a chance to tell their own stories."
"After the Sept.11 terrorist attacks, more than 5,000 people, mainly non-U.S. nationals of South Asian or Middle Eastern origin, were taken into custody by the U.S. Justice Department and held indefinitely on grounds of national security. Muslim immigrants were subject to arbitrary arrest, secret detention, solitary confinement, and deportation. Many were denied access to legal representation and communication with their families. During a period when the U.S. government has made every effort to depersonalize these detentions, refusing to reveal the names or even the number of immigrants detained, the voices of those affected — their testimonials and experiences — become our only window into the human costs of post September 11th immigration policies. Following an unconventional format, Persons of Interest presents a series of encounters between former detainees and directors Alison Maclean (Jesus’ Son) and Tobias Perse in an empty room which serves both visually and symbolically as an interrogation room, home, and prison cell. Through interviews, family photographs, and letters from prison, the directors have fashioned a compelling and poignant film, allowing those affected a chance to tell their own stories."
Sunday, September 26, 2004
A haiku 4 U....
Imperialist?
Hell no! Not the U S A!
Only led by dweebs!
I thought about making the title "A haiku a day keeps (something) away" but I didn't know if I'd have the discipline to keep it up.
That one was inspired by a few bottles of Guinness, just viewing Kill Bill: Volume 1, surfing the Children of Acid website, general boredom, general dislike of either of the two big party candidates, and probably a few other things.
Kill Bill was interesting. I'm not even totally sure why we didn't bother to see either of the Kill Bill movies in the theater. I can't wait to see the second part.
Suzanne and I were driving around town yesterday afternoon and we actually saw a Badnarik for President lawn sign in someone's front yard. I don't believe that this is one of the individuals we've seen at any of the local Badnarik in 2004 meetups. Maybe the word is getting out slowly. I haven't done as much as I should have. I need to rectify that situation...
Hell no! Not the U S A!
Only led by dweebs!
I thought about making the title "A haiku a day keeps (something) away" but I didn't know if I'd have the discipline to keep it up.
That one was inspired by a few bottles of Guinness, just viewing Kill Bill: Volume 1, surfing the Children of Acid website, general boredom, general dislike of either of the two big party candidates, and probably a few other things.
Kill Bill was interesting. I'm not even totally sure why we didn't bother to see either of the Kill Bill movies in the theater. I can't wait to see the second part.
Suzanne and I were driving around town yesterday afternoon and we actually saw a Badnarik for President lawn sign in someone's front yard. I don't believe that this is one of the individuals we've seen at any of the local Badnarik in 2004 meetups. Maybe the word is getting out slowly. I haven't done as much as I should have. I need to rectify that situation...
Friday, September 24, 2004
I've refrained from discussing PABAAH here because I think they're pathetic...
However, they're targeting a flick that I plan on seeing with a boycott. One of the beautiful things about this country is that PABAAH is free to boycott this movie while the creators were able to make it and I'll be free to go see it. The thing that I find amazing is that the character(s) in question feel that they can judge a two (or so) hour movie by a two or three minute trailer. I'm sure that Trey Parker and Matt Stone will heap ridicule on both sides of the political arena and do it in a completely blasphemous manner. More power to them. As I've mentioned at the boards, I'll see this movie at least twice in honor of the dorks who are boycotting it. The only thing PABAAH's boycott proves to me is that they probably have a lacking sense of humor and are extraordinarily quick to boycott things when they don't know the whole story.
Hell, I bet PABAAH was cheering when this guy was refused entry to the United States. I don't know the whole story, but this dude just doesn't strike me as having terrorist ties. It's always possible and maybe someone has some "double secret probation" type evidence against him. I'm not holding my breath waiting for it to make its way to the public...
Hell, I bet PABAAH was cheering when this guy was refused entry to the United States. I don't know the whole story, but this dude just doesn't strike me as having terrorist ties. It's always possible and maybe someone has some "double secret probation" type evidence against him. I'm not holding my breath waiting for it to make its way to the public...
Thursday, September 23, 2004
I was happy to receive one reasonable response to my anti-Bush/Kerry e-mail...
I suppose that I respond with e-mails against both of them because I don't feel represented well by either party. Besides, it's fun to let people know that there are political parties other than Democans/Republicrats. It gets people thinking about what they believe. I can sure as hell guarantee you that most media outlets and/or political entities don't talk much about alternatives.
Gnomedex begins next week. I'm ready now! We get to enjoy our annual CPR training at work tomorrow and then I'll be off until we get back from Tahoe.
Yahoo! has been running its Tech Tuesday column for ten months now. There's a lot of good information available. Check it out.
First it was Achim. Suzanne wasn't far behind. Both recommended checking out Firefox. I did and I like it. For now, I'm still mixing the use of both. However, I eventually intend to see if I like using an alternative exclusively. Hey, it's free! Give it a shot.
Well, I think I'll go get mentally prepared for CPR training (take that as get ready for bed). Nighty-night!
Gnomedex begins next week. I'm ready now! We get to enjoy our annual CPR training at work tomorrow and then I'll be off until we get back from Tahoe.
Yahoo! has been running its Tech Tuesday column for ten months now. There's a lot of good information available. Check it out.
First it was Achim. Suzanne wasn't far behind. Both recommended checking out Firefox. I did and I like it. For now, I'm still mixing the use of both. However, I eventually intend to see if I like using an alternative exclusively. Hey, it's free! Give it a shot.
Well, I think I'll go get mentally prepared for CPR training (take that as get ready for bed). Nighty-night!
Tuesday, September 21, 2004
Two score and eighteen years ago, my father....
Was brought forth into this world.
Happy Birthday Zzaj!
I haven't talked much about the whole CBS thing because it really gets my goat. I checked out the documents online and had questions from the minute I saw them. There are issues that are much more important. However, just like the upcoming crap debates (for which you can be sure that a new Memorandum of Understanding has been drafted), issues and tough questions are rarely tackled and third parties are rarely invited.
Last week, I received a "10 reasons why Christians can't vote for Kerry" e-mail. This week, I just received a "10 reasons why Christians should vote for Bush" e-mail. I just finished sending my retort. I'm sure it will stir up some crap. I won't vote for the candidate I was using as an example, but I still won't be voting for Dubya OR Kerry either. I just received the first response. It was a "mail delivery failure" message from an AOL user who apparently doesn't want to hear about politics. I wonder if the blocker blocks the messages from the individual who sent me this gack in the first place...
Happy Birthday Zzaj!
I haven't talked much about the whole CBS thing because it really gets my goat. I checked out the documents online and had questions from the minute I saw them. There are issues that are much more important. However, just like the upcoming crap debates (for which you can be sure that a new Memorandum of Understanding has been drafted), issues and tough questions are rarely tackled and third parties are rarely invited.
Last week, I received a "10 reasons why Christians can't vote for Kerry" e-mail. This week, I just received a "10 reasons why Christians should vote for Bush" e-mail. I just finished sending my retort. I'm sure it will stir up some crap. I won't vote for the candidate I was using as an example, but I still won't be voting for Dubya OR Kerry either. I just received the first response. It was a "mail delivery failure" message from an AOL user who apparently doesn't want to hear about politics. I wonder if the blocker blocks the messages from the individual who sent me this gack in the first place...
Sunday, September 19, 2004
First, we heard about the CIA's July NIE regarding Iraq...
Now there's news that even some Republicans are criticizing Dubya and Co.'s policies regarding Iraq. The administration's smiling face and assertions that all will be well reminds me of the young ROTC officer trying to maintain control of the crowd near the end of the movie Animal House...
"All is well. Remain calm. ALL IS WELL! REMAIN CALM!"
I hope that Dubya's re-election campaign will suffer the same fate as the ROTC officer. The crowd didn't remain calm and the poor young dude was flattened as people ran away from the chaotic scene. Four more years...of what? Pre-emptive defense?!? Will it be Iran next? They sure seem to be high profile on the radar.
Speaking of Iran...I feel that it's always important to listen to what other people (friendly or otherwise) are saying. Following that line of thinking, check out the Islamic Republic News Agency's website (from Iran). I'm pretty sure that I've put the link for North Korea's official propaganda mouthpiece here before. If I haven't, click here and enjoy.
Although my 20 year reunion is still four years away, I still like to occasionally see who I can find via the internet. I've been an unpaid member at one "past connections" site for at least five years and they have a pretty fair number of individuals listed from my graduating class. However, there are other places (e.g. Yahoo! groups) that have comparable features and don't currently want $39/year.
I just reviewed the text of Dubya's latest weekly radio address. The last paragraph is interesting. I want to know what "additional proposals" Dubya will make. He says, "For the sake of our common security, and for the sake of our common values, the international community must rise to this historic moment. And the United States is prepared to lead." That sounds very similar to the argument Dubya used to call the UN to action against Iraq...
"All is well. Remain calm. ALL IS WELL! REMAIN CALM!"
I hope that Dubya's re-election campaign will suffer the same fate as the ROTC officer. The crowd didn't remain calm and the poor young dude was flattened as people ran away from the chaotic scene. Four more years...of what? Pre-emptive defense?!? Will it be Iran next? They sure seem to be high profile on the radar.
Speaking of Iran...I feel that it's always important to listen to what other people (friendly or otherwise) are saying. Following that line of thinking, check out the Islamic Republic News Agency's website (from Iran). I'm pretty sure that I've put the link for North Korea's official propaganda mouthpiece here before. If I haven't, click here and enjoy.
Although my 20 year reunion is still four years away, I still like to occasionally see who I can find via the internet. I've been an unpaid member at one "past connections" site for at least five years and they have a pretty fair number of individuals listed from my graduating class. However, there are other places (e.g. Yahoo! groups) that have comparable features and don't currently want $39/year.
I just reviewed the text of Dubya's latest weekly radio address. The last paragraph is interesting. I want to know what "additional proposals" Dubya will make. He says, "For the sake of our common security, and for the sake of our common values, the international community must rise to this historic moment. And the United States is prepared to lead." That sounds very similar to the argument Dubya used to call the UN to action against Iraq...
Thursday, September 16, 2004
Here we go again...
Our country is rating other countries on the amount of religious freedom that exists in them. First, it's not our job. We can hope that other countries will espouse tolerance, but we should never make any attempt to enforce tolerance. Using a carrot and stick in the effort to coerce other countries to take on our rather liberal view of tolerance is just plain silly and likely to reinforce already widespread resentment of the United States. Your tax money, hard at work....
What do you get when you remove a tyrannical leader (who was supported by the US for years) who maintained an iron grip on his country in the Middle East? Let's hope the CIA's worst predictions don't come true. That article is at the New York Times. You can either register for free or go here for logins from people who have registered bypass accounts. If the first one doesn't work, click the "This login didn't work" button for a different login.
I guess that one of our reasons for going in is scheduled for termination. The Iraq Survey Group is about to release a report saying that we have found no WMD (excluding a decades old sarin shell). I still wonder why we had bio-weapons related material going to Hussein AFTER the first Gulf War...
What do you get when you remove a tyrannical leader (who was supported by the US for years) who maintained an iron grip on his country in the Middle East? Let's hope the CIA's worst predictions don't come true. That article is at the New York Times. You can either register for free or go here for logins from people who have registered bypass accounts. If the first one doesn't work, click the "This login didn't work" button for a different login.
I guess that one of our reasons for going in is scheduled for termination. The Iraq Survey Group is about to release a report saying that we have found no WMD (excluding a decades old sarin shell). I still wonder why we had bio-weapons related material going to Hussein AFTER the first Gulf War...
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
Lest I forget....
Go wish Jim and company the best of luck. This bastard Ivan looks like he wants to take a drive right up I-65.
I've never been much of one for signs or omens or the like (and I'm still not)...
However, it's totally unusual (I've never seen this) to see an immense rainbow (while I was on the way home from work this morning) that looked as if it spanned the width of the Mississippi River and then see another full and colorful arch right before sunset this evening. Perhaps the Norse gods are coming back via Bifrost.
This morning I noticed that Achim's blog had been updated recently. While looking around his links page, I noticed that he had links to a couple of Wikimedia sites. I had no idea that there was so much info available via Wikis. I didn't say much about 9/11/01 on 9/11/04 because I wanted to contemplate in silence and refrain from tarnishing a day of remembrance with my abhorrence for the fact that our ELECTED leaders still believe that we need to spread democracy (or any of our other ideals) throughout the world or create peace in areas of the world that have seen strife since before our country came into being. However, I noticed a wiki project that has great potential for the fourth and/or fifth anniversary of 9/11. It would be amazing to see the 9/11 Memorial section of Wikipedia grow by leaps and bounds as a tribute to what was lost on that day. Anybody can contribute to the wiki. If you have something to say, go say it. It would probably be best to familiarize yourself with how to do so first.
This morning I noticed that Achim's blog had been updated recently. While looking around his links page, I noticed that he had links to a couple of Wikimedia sites. I had no idea that there was so much info available via Wikis. I didn't say much about 9/11/01 on 9/11/04 because I wanted to contemplate in silence and refrain from tarnishing a day of remembrance with my abhorrence for the fact that our ELECTED leaders still believe that we need to spread democracy (or any of our other ideals) throughout the world or create peace in areas of the world that have seen strife since before our country came into being. However, I noticed a wiki project that has great potential for the fourth and/or fifth anniversary of 9/11. It would be amazing to see the 9/11 Memorial section of Wikipedia grow by leaps and bounds as a tribute to what was lost on that day. Anybody can contribute to the wiki. If you have something to say, go say it. It would probably be best to familiarize yourself with how to do so first.
Tuesday, September 14, 2004
As we are often prone to do, we were having a discussion at work the other night...
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Monday, September 13, 2004
First and foremost, there's an amber alert that doesn't appear to be showing up on the ticker yet...
This amber alert is from Silvis, IL. See here for details. Maybe it will show up a little later. Update: This appears as if it has been canceled.
I think I've recovered from the twelve-hour nights. You can ask Suzanne. I was 100% WAXED. It's better now...
The bunnies have left the yard.
I have three gmail invites. Leave a comment with an email address and I'll speed an invitation on its way.
Zeitgeist anyone?
I think I've recovered from the twelve-hour nights. You can ask Suzanne. I was 100% WAXED. It's better now...
The bunnies have left the yard.
I have three gmail invites. Leave a comment with an email address and I'll speed an invitation on its way.
Zeitgeist anyone?
Thursday, September 09, 2004
We're about T-20 days and counting...
Perhaps I'll have my desktop fixed by then. At least I've got the laptop. I had a few issues with my desktop recently and now it's acting like the power supply is wonky. If I have to buy many more new parts, I might just bite the bullet and buy a cheap new system. I like the ease of piece by piece replacement. Heck, I've had most of my current system for at least four years (some pieces longer). However, it seems like the point of diminishing returns is getting near.
Charley came and went. That beeeeeyotch Frances did another number on Florida. Ivan's now waiting in the wings. You might ask what the next series of storms will be named. Click here and see. Actually, that whole site has a great deal of information.
P.S. - I was able to mow the lawn today without killing any bunnies. However, I think I did scare the crap out of them. Perhaps they are scarred for life. For what it's worth, I don't subscribe to the philosophies presented at the aforementioned link. I just thought it was funny.
Monday, September 06, 2004
C-Span...
I'm watching C-Span right now. Michael Badnarik and David Cobb (Libertarian and Green respectively) are in the midst of a pre-recorded debate that actually took place on 8/31/2004. I'll bet you didn't hear anything about it in the "news". I hope that it will be available online sometime.
Suzanne's last paragraph in this entry is making fun of Dubya. I have deeper problems with other things that Dubya says. One of the blurbs he has been repeatedly using for a little while is, "The wisest use of American strength is to advance freedom. I believe America is called to lead the cause of freedom. I believe that millions in the Middle East plead in silence for their liberty. I believe that given the chance, they will embrace the most honorable form of government every devised by man. I believe all these things because I understand freedom is not America's gift to the world, freedom is the almighty God's gift to each man and woman in this world." I happen to disagree that "American strength" is the best way to get the word out.
In keeping with the finest traditions of Labor Day, I labored. I can't complain much. Suzanne worked for four hours this morning and I worked until 3 PM.
If you're Chinese, you'd better not peddle porn online. 250,000 clicks on a Chinese-owned porn site could land the owner in prison FOR LIFE. I realize that there are plenty of people in this country who wouldn't mind seeing penalties similar to that for porn-peddling (or perhaps even surfing). While we're at it, let's lock up all cheesecake-eating, cigarette-smoking, beer-swilling, non-church-going, dissent-speaking (or any combination thereof and more) people. We'd be better off, right? That brings me to one thing we were talking about at work today. I don't see how anyone would ever want to be a polygamist. However, I think that the Supreme Court decision that upheld law against it was wrong. I don't care what the European traditions said about polygamy. I care if anyone's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness is being violated.
Suzanne's last paragraph in this entry is making fun of Dubya. I have deeper problems with other things that Dubya says. One of the blurbs he has been repeatedly using for a little while is, "The wisest use of American strength is to advance freedom. I believe America is called to lead the cause of freedom. I believe that millions in the Middle East plead in silence for their liberty. I believe that given the chance, they will embrace the most honorable form of government every devised by man. I believe all these things because I understand freedom is not America's gift to the world, freedom is the almighty God's gift to each man and woman in this world." I happen to disagree that "American strength" is the best way to get the word out.
In keeping with the finest traditions of Labor Day, I labored. I can't complain much. Suzanne worked for four hours this morning and I worked until 3 PM.
If you're Chinese, you'd better not peddle porn online. 250,000 clicks on a Chinese-owned porn site could land the owner in prison FOR LIFE. I realize that there are plenty of people in this country who wouldn't mind seeing penalties similar to that for porn-peddling (or perhaps even surfing). While we're at it, let's lock up all cheesecake-eating, cigarette-smoking, beer-swilling, non-church-going, dissent-speaking (or any combination thereof and more) people. We'd be better off, right? That brings me to one thing we were talking about at work today. I don't see how anyone would ever want to be a polygamist. However, I think that the Supreme Court decision that upheld law against it was wrong. I don't care what the European traditions said about polygamy. I care if anyone's right to life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness is being violated.
Friday, September 03, 2004
So....The four remaining bunnies are doing fairly well.
So is our kitty. She's not so sure what to think of bunnies. See (click the pic for more animals)?
Well, we're doing our 12-hour days starting tomorrow so I need to go crash.
Well, we're doing our 12-hour days starting tomorrow so I need to go crash.
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
What Arnold says...
"If you believe that government should be accountable to the people, not the people to the government...then you are a Republican! If you believe a person should be treated as an individual, not as a member of an interest group... then you are a Republican! If you believe your family knows how to spend your money better than the government does... then you are a Republican! If you believe our educational system should be held accountable for the progress of our children ... then you are a Republican! If you believe this country, not the United Nations, is the best hope of democracy in the world ... then you are a Republican! And, ladies and gentlemen ...if you believe we must be fierce and relentless and terminate terrorism ... then you are a Republican!"
-Arnold Schwarzenegger, Republican Convention 2004, 8/31/2004
What I say...
If you believe that government should be accountable to the people, not the people to the government...then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe a person should be treated as an individual, not as a member of an interest group... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe your family knows how to spend your money better than the government does... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe our educational system should be held accountable for the progress of our children ... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe this country, not the United Nations, is the best hope of democracy in the world ... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! And, ladies and gentlemen ...if you believe we must be fierce and relentless and terminate terrorism ... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian (however, force isn't the only way a Libertarian would work on terrorism)!
-Arnold Schwarzenegger, Republican Convention 2004, 8/31/2004
What I say...
If you believe that government should be accountable to the people, not the people to the government...then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe a person should be treated as an individual, not as a member of an interest group... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe your family knows how to spend your money better than the government does... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe our educational system should be held accountable for the progress of our children ... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! If you believe this country, not the United Nations, is the best hope of democracy in the world ... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian! And, ladies and gentlemen ...if you believe we must be fierce and relentless and terminate terrorism ... then you are a RepublicanLibertarian (however, force isn't the only way a Libertarian would work on terrorism)!
The key to reasonable political dialogue...
I don't agree with the political stance of many of the people I work with. We still get along. Last week, my wife pointed me to "MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy". I checked it out and even though I don't agree with everything she's saying, I can still be friendly. People often lose sight of this. There are frequently violent protesters at political or other major gatherings. I'm not saying that these people don't have the right to protest or even protest where they want (in public at least). However, the violence is often intriguing considering that at least part of what they are often protesting is violence.
I feel that there are a few important things to remember. I don't think that we're to the point where we need a revolution. That eliminates the need for violence. Another point to remember is that you can't always change people. You can present your argument for what you believe and then let it be. If you're told, "Enough!"... leave it at that. Frequent obscenity (although I am sometimes an offender) might prove that you are emotional about issues, but doesn't add much else to the political discourse. Civility is always the best way to go.
McCain said it well on Monday night:
"All of us, despite the differences that enliven our politics, are united in the one big idea that freedom is our birthright and its defense is always our first responsibility. All other responsibilities come second."
One side note...To read about goings-on from the convention from the vantage point of the NYPD, click here.
I feel that there are a few important things to remember. I don't think that we're to the point where we need a revolution. That eliminates the need for violence. Another point to remember is that you can't always change people. You can present your argument for what you believe and then let it be. If you're told, "Enough!"... leave it at that. Frequent obscenity (although I am sometimes an offender) might prove that you are emotional about issues, but doesn't add much else to the political discourse. Civility is always the best way to go.
McCain said it well on Monday night:
"All of us, despite the differences that enliven our politics, are united in the one big idea that freedom is our birthright and its defense is always our first responsibility. All other responsibilities come second."
One side note...To read about goings-on from the convention from the vantage point of the NYPD, click here.
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
Until this afternoon, it had been quite some time since either of us had seen an IMAX film...
We went to the Putnam Museum IMAX theater to see the third Harry Potter flick. The movie wasn't bad and we've always loved a good IMAX experience. We'll be going back for other films. I told Suzanne that we should check out the rest of the Putnam Museum as well.
It was interesting to see Michael Moore at the Republican convention last night. He's writing for USA Today (still waiting to see any mention of Badnarik, Cobb, or Peroutka at USA Today). Moore put out this op-ed for USA Today last night. One interesting thing to note was that USA Today had a noted conservative covering the Democratic convention back in July. That's a pretty funky way to do things. I like it.
Also of interest (I have to admit that I haven't read either document yet) are the Democratic and Republican platforms for 2004. I happen to believe that my thinking will be more in-line with the Libertarian platform. For further reading, here are the Green and Constitution Party platforms.
Check out the August issue of Ballot Access News.
It was interesting to see Michael Moore at the Republican convention last night. He's writing for USA Today (still waiting to see any mention of Badnarik, Cobb, or Peroutka at USA Today). Moore put out this op-ed for USA Today last night. One interesting thing to note was that USA Today had a noted conservative covering the Democratic convention back in July. That's a pretty funky way to do things. I like it.
Also of interest (I have to admit that I haven't read either document yet) are the Democratic and Republican platforms for 2004. I happen to believe that my thinking will be more in-line with the Libertarian platform. For further reading, here are the Green and Constitution Party platforms.
Check out the August issue of Ballot Access News.
Sunday, August 29, 2004
I'm not totally sure what I think of what follows below...
George Bush is using the White House website to host a description of his "accomplishments". This seems as if it belongs on Dubya's campaign website. I don't care if Bush is posting a record touting what he says he has accomplished. However, he is using a federal government website to do so. Interestingly enough, Dubya's WHITE HOUSE HOSTED WEBSITE ABOUT ECONOMIC GROWTH AND JOB CREATION doesn't mention the latest report from the Census Bureau that talks about poverty growing in this country. Additionally, Dubya's stance against gay marriage was deemed important enough to be the last item on this page. That seems like a great use of American taxpayer money...
I'll catch her at the pass...
I'm sure that Suzanne will later regale the world with tales of my dastardly deed for the day. Before she does, I'll say it myself. I never walk down the yard before I mow it. I suppose that I should and I will be much more likely to do so now. I killed a baby bunny. Weapon of choice? A lawnmower. I had no clue that there was a nest of the babies in my backyard. Unfortunately, the little lepine was still alive. Fortunately, the others appeared to be fine. I covered their nest back up (and marked it) after I retrieved the mortally wounded bunny baby. I felt bad about it, but I put the poor animal out of its misery. It still sucks and now Suzanne is calling me a bunny-killer.
It seems like time has flown. The closing ceremony is tonight.
On a much happier note:
It seems like time has flown. The closing ceremony is tonight.
On a much happier note:
Happy Birthday Olivia!
Saturday, August 28, 2004
Don't ask me why, but...
One of the thoughts that kept crossing my mind at work on Thursday (before I got to take off for my six days off) was if Japanese (or Chinese or Albanian or Ethiopian) monsters universally say, "Rawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwrrrrrrrrr!" As I said, don't ask me why that thought crossed my mind. I have no clue.
The Badnarik.org site has a new section. It's all about ballot access. Michael currently has more ballot access than any of the other third party candidates. Do you hear much about him? Nope! Can you do an article search at a major newspaper website like USA Today and have 0 results returned? Yep! Why is that? Will you see Badnarik in the debates between Bush and Kerry? I would personally love to see him there, but it's a slim chance. Nader has significantly less ballot access than Michael Badnarik, Michael Peroutka, or David Cobb. However, if a third party is included on a major media outlet website, that candidate is likely to be Nader (sites like usatoday.com's Campaign 2004 candidate guide and msn.com's 2004 Election Guide are examples). That seems very strange...
One last issue, Bush wants to get rid of 527s. I guess free speech in a campaign only applies to certain people. Perhaps Orwell was a prophet...
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
The Badnarik.org site has a new section. It's all about ballot access. Michael currently has more ballot access than any of the other third party candidates. Do you hear much about him? Nope! Can you do an article search at a major newspaper website like USA Today and have 0 results returned? Yep! Why is that? Will you see Badnarik in the debates between Bush and Kerry? I would personally love to see him there, but it's a slim chance. Nader has significantly less ballot access than Michael Badnarik, Michael Peroutka, or David Cobb. However, if a third party is included on a major media outlet website, that candidate is likely to be Nader (sites like usatoday.com's Campaign 2004 candidate guide and msn.com's 2004 Election Guide are examples). That seems very strange...
One last issue, Bush wants to get rid of 527s. I guess free speech in a campaign only applies to certain people. Perhaps Orwell was a prophet...
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
Wednesday, August 25, 2004
My initial gut feeling (complemented by a little research) was right...
I guess that some normative psychological evaluations assume that if you answer that your life is too good, that could be a bad thing. I don't completely understand how it's possible to be feeling too good. I suppose that I don't understand a lot of things...
So there I am last night...One of the first annoying things (other than the usual spam announcing the same useless crap) I got in my email was a completely unoriginal virus hoax. Within five minutes, I received the following (cut for some measure of brevity) from the same individual:
"Dear Friends:
Pray for the President as he is peparing his acceptance speech. And pray for him as he gives his speech.
Prayer makes a difference.
--cut to protect privacy--
ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822
From: President George W. Bush
To: --cut to protect privacy--
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 03:05:00 -0400
Subject: Will you help me?
President George W. Bush
www.GeorgeWBush.com
Dear --cut to protect privacy--,
In two weeks, I will proudly accept our Party's nomination for the Presidency of the United States. I will then travel the country to ask for the vote, telling Americans about my agenda to make a safer world and a more hopeful America in my next term.
I will win if you continue to stand with us in the weeks ahead. There's a lot to do and our convention is a wonderful opportunity to energize our fellow Republicans and draw to our banner discerning Democrats and Independents. Will you help me do that?
www.GeorgeWBush.com/Party
Will you open your home during the convention and reach out to your friends, family and neighbors by hosting a convention watch party on September 2nd, the night I make my acceptance speech?
This would help spread our positive message in a very important way. There is no better messenger for me than you. There is no better way to help us communicate our ideals than by sharing our convention with neighbors.
Will you help me?
www.GeorgeWBush.com/Party
Victory depends on all of us making every effort to persuade people to join us and then getting them to the polls. I hope you will share our celebration and host a party in your home.
Thanks again for all you do.
Sincerely,
George W. Bush"
Needless to say, I will not be praying for Dubya. I hope like hell that Barney eats his speech and that Dubya will have to improvise. That would undoubtedly make this individual's quest much easier. I don't hate Bush, I just want him back in Crawford. I almost wish that I could run the streets of NYC during the Republicon convention. I suppose that I could, but I have better things to do.
So there I am last night...One of the first annoying things (other than the usual spam announcing the same useless crap) I got in my email was a completely unoriginal virus hoax. Within five minutes, I received the following (cut for some measure of brevity) from the same individual:
"Dear Friends:
Pray for the President as he is peparing his acceptance speech. And pray for him as he gives his speech.
Prayer makes a difference.
--cut to protect privacy--
ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822
From: President George W. Bush
To: --cut to protect privacy--
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 03:05:00 -0400
Subject: Will you help me?
President George W. Bush
www.GeorgeWBush.com
Dear --cut to protect privacy--,
In two weeks, I will proudly accept our Party's nomination for the Presidency of the United States. I will then travel the country to ask for the vote, telling Americans about my agenda to make a safer world and a more hopeful America in my next term.
I will win if you continue to stand with us in the weeks ahead. There's a lot to do and our convention is a wonderful opportunity to energize our fellow Republicans and draw to our banner discerning Democrats and Independents. Will you help me do that?
www.GeorgeWBush.com/Party
Will you open your home during the convention and reach out to your friends, family and neighbors by hosting a convention watch party on September 2nd, the night I make my acceptance speech?
This would help spread our positive message in a very important way. There is no better messenger for me than you. There is no better way to help us communicate our ideals than by sharing our convention with neighbors.
Will you help me?
www.GeorgeWBush.com/Party
Victory depends on all of us making every effort to persuade people to join us and then getting them to the polls. I hope you will share our celebration and host a party in your home.
Thanks again for all you do.
Sincerely,
George W. Bush"
Needless to say, I will not be praying for Dubya. I hope like hell that Barney eats his speech and that Dubya will have to improvise. That would undoubtedly make this individual's quest much easier. I don't hate Bush, I just want him back in Crawford. I almost wish that I could run the streets of NYC during the Republicon convention. I suppose that I could, but I have better things to do.
Monday, August 23, 2004
In no way am I going to say, "Go vote for Kerry!"...
However, the latest "Swift Boat Vets for Truth" ad is just more proof that political activist commercials don't necessarily have to tell the complete truth. This is true whether the creator of the ad is the Swift Vets or Michael Moore. I don't even think that I've seen the ad on television (other than in news analysis). However, it gives little snippets of John Kerry's testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from 1971. The ad doesn't come anywhere close to providing context. I fear that in our "instant gratification", "give me a snippet and it'll be good enough" society, the full picture of what Kerry said in 1971 might be hard to visualize unless you read the whole thing. Yes, it's long.
The Annenberg Political Fact Check Center has a decent write-up on why half-truths are allowed to continue. The hard thing to accept is that I know there are people who won't do their own research. Believe it or not, there are some people who will take Fox News (O'Reilly and Fox are still too chicken-hearted to have Michael Badnarik make an appearance) or Democratic Underground at face value.
So, there we are about a week and a half ago, taking a 567 question psychological test. For some reason, mine was flagged as requiring follow-up. My curiosity has been piqued. Some of my co-workers say that I should wear the kilt to the interview on Wednesday. I don't think I will. When I mentioned this to Suzanne, she seemed a little worried. I'm not so worried.
The Annenberg Political Fact Check Center has a decent write-up on why half-truths are allowed to continue. The hard thing to accept is that I know there are people who won't do their own research. Believe it or not, there are some people who will take Fox News (O'Reilly and Fox are still too chicken-hearted to have Michael Badnarik make an appearance) or Democratic Underground at face value.
So, there we are about a week and a half ago, taking a 567 question psychological test. For some reason, mine was flagged as requiring follow-up. My curiosity has been piqued. Some of my co-workers say that I should wear the kilt to the interview on Wednesday. I don't think I will. When I mentioned this to Suzanne, she seemed a little worried. I'm not so worried.
Saturday, August 21, 2004
Wazzup?
I'm of half a mind to believe that shimmering sheets of ice engulfed this town in early July. Why do I believe that Hell (MI) might have frozen over in July? Well, it started on July 8th at this place. Yes, John Dvorak now has a blog. After his speech at Gnomedex last year (and several articles in PC Magazine), I figured that Dvorak would never blog.
I'd never even heard of the "Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer". That link says that the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer is "the free, best practices vulnerability assessment tool for the Microsoft platform." I downloaded it and ran it and, sure enough, it said that I don't have SP2. I won't for a little while. Hey, this free security test tool might be worth the download. Every little bit helps.
Well, it's almost time to get ready for work. I volunteered for it. Hell, it's hard to beat 45/60$ an hour for working overtime. With that, adieu...
I'd never even heard of the "Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer". That link says that the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer is "the free, best practices vulnerability assessment tool for the Microsoft platform." I downloaded it and ran it and, sure enough, it said that I don't have SP2. I won't for a little while. Hey, this free security test tool might be worth the download. Every little bit helps.
Well, it's almost time to get ready for work. I volunteered for it. Hell, it's hard to beat 45/60$ an hour for working overtime. With that, adieu...
Friday, August 20, 2004
I've never been very fond of Michelle Malkin...
Last night's debacle on Hardball doesn't necessarily help matters. She later made this post on her blog about her fun at MSNBC. About halfway through, she mentions, "I am used to ad hominem attacks." I don't know if she agrees with them or not. However, given the title of her post and other things I've heard her say, she dishes out ad hominem attacks as well. I find it odd that she has written a book defending internment of Japanese Americans during WWII and perhaps suggesting parallels to our "war on terror". Perhaps she should be shackled up and locked somewhere incognito. After all, her parents immigrated from the Philippines. As everyone knows, the Abu Sayyaf group is also based in the Philippines and is designated as a foreign terrorist organization. Hell, we should have locked up a lot of white males after Timothy McVeigh. I don't ever see Malkin's "solution" being used. As I've said before, I'll keep watching.
We're watching the Olympics right now. I saw a commercial for the spin-off of Friends that is supposed to begin in the new NBC fall season. I would just like to know why they chose the most air-headed character from Friends as the basis for a new sitcom. I was already "Friends'd" out when the show went off the air. I probably won't be watching the spin-off either.
We're watching the Olympics right now. I saw a commercial for the spin-off of Friends that is supposed to begin in the new NBC fall season. I would just like to know why they chose the most air-headed character from Friends as the basis for a new sitcom. I was already "Friends'd" out when the show went off the air. I probably won't be watching the spin-off either.
Wednesday, August 18, 2004
Iacta alea est!
As Suzanne mentioned earlier, we are GOING TO GNOMEDEX. I'm 101% stoked about this because I didn't originally think that we'd be able to make it this year. We made it to Des Moines for the last two years. Now we'll be hittin' Tahoe at the end of September. Suzanne arranged everything this morning.
I have occasionally visited the archive.org website. I never perused through it a lot. It was interesting to note this morning that they are more than a web archive. They also have sections devoted to movies, books, and audio.
I have occasionally visited the archive.org website. I never perused through it a lot. It was interesting to note this morning that they are more than a web archive. They also have sections devoted to movies, books, and audio.
Tuesday, August 17, 2004
There's still hope...
Suzanne was telling me that she wouldn't mind doing Gnomedex again this year. If all goes well, I'll know whether I have the days off in the next day or so. I'm ready to party my ass off and get geeky. Wait, I'm already there.
I want to see this sport in the Olympics. At the very least, net footbag would be interesting.
One of the neighbors behind us was walking his two dogs down our street tonight. No biggie, right? The only thing that bothered me was that his 2-3 year old daughter was holding the leash for one of the dogs. Being the weird one that I am, Suzanne and I were standing out front with our cat. Needless to say, the dogs were interested when they saw our cat. That's understandable... The dog that the little girl was holding lunged a little, dragged the young girl down, and got free. Suzanne said she felt bad for the little girl. So do I. Why try to let such a young girl control a dog (that probably weighs as much as she does) when you know that the dog might try to get free? I suppose I could have taken my cat inside, but it's my front yard. Screw that!
I want to see this sport in the Olympics. At the very least, net footbag would be interesting.
One of the neighbors behind us was walking his two dogs down our street tonight. No biggie, right? The only thing that bothered me was that his 2-3 year old daughter was holding the leash for one of the dogs. Being the weird one that I am, Suzanne and I were standing out front with our cat. Needless to say, the dogs were interested when they saw our cat. That's understandable... The dog that the little girl was holding lunged a little, dragged the young girl down, and got free. Suzanne said she felt bad for the little girl. So do I. Why try to let such a young girl control a dog (that probably weighs as much as she does) when you know that the dog might try to get free? I suppose I could have taken my cat inside, but it's my front yard. Screw that!
Monday, August 16, 2004
There was a story in the New York Times the other day about the FBI questioning potential protesters in NY...
They say they are just looking for people who could become violent during the Republican convention at the end of August. The original piece can be read here. The FBI's response is here.
Interestingly enough, the FBI's front page (on 8/16 @ 2105 CDT) is touting the FOIA "virtual reading room". The FBI has been known to go overboard in the past. Imagine how far they could go if they tested the bounds of the Patriot Act.
I can just see it now...
News flash: The FBI has announced that whole new classes of protesters planning to show up in NYC for the Republican convention will be subject to increased scrutiny and/or questioning. New guidance has been passed on to FBI field offices to question potential protesters who plan to attend the Republican convention at the end of August and have any of the following attributes:
feet
hands
a voice
paper
computers
Questioned about the new groups of people to be interrogated (oops, he meant to say questioned politely), an anonymous senior FBI official said, "Feet and hands are obvious. Anyone who has seen a Bruce Lee movie knows that feet and hands can be deadly weapons. Paper and/or computers? Gutenberg's printing press launched a revolution in the ability of people to learn and make up their own minds. We don't need any revolutions during this convention, do we?"
I'm sure things will never go this far (or will they?) but I will be watching closely. Imagine if KING George had tools as sweeping as the PATRIOT Act...
Interestingly enough, the FBI's front page (on 8/16 @ 2105 CDT) is touting the FOIA "virtual reading room". The FBI has been known to go overboard in the past. Imagine how far they could go if they tested the bounds of the Patriot Act.
I can just see it now...
News flash: The FBI has announced that whole new classes of protesters planning to show up in NYC for the Republican convention will be subject to increased scrutiny and/or questioning. New guidance has been passed on to FBI field offices to question potential protesters who plan to attend the Republican convention at the end of August and have any of the following attributes:
feet
hands
a voice
paper
computers
Questioned about the new groups of people to be interrogated (oops, he meant to say questioned politely), an anonymous senior FBI official said, "Feet and hands are obvious. Anyone who has seen a Bruce Lee movie knows that feet and hands can be deadly weapons. Paper and/or computers? Gutenberg's printing press launched a revolution in the ability of people to learn and make up their own minds. We don't need any revolutions during this convention, do we?"
I'm sure things will never go this far (or will they?) but I will be watching closely. Imagine if KING George had tools as sweeping as the PATRIOT Act...
Sunday, August 15, 2004
Things that make you go hmmmm.......
I just finished reading Imperial Hubris about five or six days ago. I was taking time to let the book soak in and start reading The 9/11 Commission Report. My final take on Imperial Hubris is that it was a damn fine book. The author SEEMED as if he was able to view the mistakes and problems he talks about from where they were being made. The one thing I liked best about this book is that it presents one argument for why I want Bush out this year. Going after people who want to kill us is fine. However, if we wanted Osama and company dead or alive, we should have inundated Afghanistan with American forces. It wouldn't have been easy, but I'm sure that we could have managed. Another downfall of this administration (and I'm sure that the Democrats would be doing the same thing) is that we seem completely unwilling to see if any of the arguments used by bin Laden to recruit might be fueled by U.S. policy. Reevaluation of policy concerning the Middle East would go a long way towards taking some of the sting out of bin Laden's ability to recruit. Iraq? I won't even go there.
The author of Imperial Hubris cites a great quote from John Quincy Adams. That quote follows:
"Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her [America’s] heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will recommend the general cause, by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself, beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force…. She might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit."
-John Quincy Adams, 1821
The author convincingly argues that when we have an enemy, we must aim to completely DESTROY that enemy. However, there are other things we can do to make ourselves safer. Amazingly, the author's foreign policy would seem to correspond with that of the Libertarians. That's my view.
One well-followed blog (and one post in particular) calls this "silly Panglossianism". I don't believe that evaluating/changing our policy will END terrorism (nor do I think the Libertarians believe that). However, I believe it would make matters more difficult for the bin Ladens of the world. Every little bit helps.
The author of Imperial Hubris cites a great quote from John Quincy Adams. That quote follows:
"Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her [America’s] heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will recommend the general cause, by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself, beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force…. She might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit."
-John Quincy Adams, 1821
The author convincingly argues that when we have an enemy, we must aim to completely DESTROY that enemy. However, there are other things we can do to make ourselves safer. Amazingly, the author's foreign policy would seem to correspond with that of the Libertarians. That's my view.
One well-followed blog (and one post in particular) calls this "silly Panglossianism". I don't believe that evaluating/changing our policy will END terrorism (nor do I think the Libertarians believe that). However, I believe it would make matters more difficult for the bin Ladens of the world. Every little bit helps.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)